An Empirical Study of the Impact of the Banking System on the Sustainable Development of the National Economy

Authors

  • Kazanbayeva Zhanar Department of Business and Tourism, Central Asian Innovation University, Shymkent 160000, Kazakhstan;
  • Onlassynov Yerlan Department of Business and Tourism, Central Asian Innovation University, Shymkent 160000, Kazakhstan;
  • Saparbaev Marat Department of Business and Tourism, Central Asian Innovation University, Shymkent 160000, Kazakhstan;
  • Jaxymbetova Saltanat Department of Business and Tourism, Central Asian Innovation University, Shymkent 160000, Kazakhstan;
  • Balabekova Dina Department of Economics and management, Central Asian Innovation University, Shymkent 160000, Kazakhstan.
  • Zhadigerova Gulshat Department of Economics and management, Central Asian Innovation University, Shymkent 160000, Kazakhstan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n4a2085

Keywords:

systemically important banks, sustainable development, performance criteria, financial stability of the country.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to assess the degree of influence of systemically important banks on the stability of the financial system of Kazakhstan, which determines the level of development and stability of the national economy as a whole, based on indicators proposed by the International Monetary Fund. Methodology: Among the research methods used, one can single out the method of analysis, comparison, generalization, as well as the method of statistical analysis and classification.. The originality of the research is due to the fact that at present, in the context of globalization, the importance of issues related to the development of the national economy of the country, ensuring its sustainability and efficiency is increasing. The results of the study: The main research directions are due to the lack of theoretical and methodological elaboration of this issue and its increasing practical significance. The results of the study suggest that Kazakhstan's large banking institutions have a significant impact on the country's financial stability indicators. Also, based on the analysis of publications by other scientists on the research topic, their own conclusions and conclusions were formed. The materials of the article are of practical value and can be used in the development of modern methods for strengthening the financial stability of the country.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ciriacy-Wantrup, S. V., Bishop, R. C., & Andersen, S. O. (2019). The economics of environmental policy. In Natural Resource Economics (pp. 39-50). Routledge.

Shisharina, N. V. (2025). Key Personality Qualities: Challenges and Resources of Modern Education. SIBERIAN PEDAGOGICAL JOURNAL, 8.

Shmelev, S. E. (2011). Ecological economics: sustainability in practice. Springer Science & Business Media.

Phillips, R. (2024). Worldwatch Institute. In Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 7873-7873). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Desai, B. H. (2020). 14. United nations environment programme (UNEP). Yearbook of International Environmental Law, 31(1), 319-325.

Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., & Randers, J. (1994). The limits to growth. Moscow: Progress.

Chumakov, A. N., & Yurchenko, P. S. (2021). Global pandemic in terms of objective causes and subjective speculations. Journal of Globalization Studies, 12(2), 157-168.

Bataykin, P. A., Khasanova, A. S., Shlychkov, V. V., Toumashev, A. R., & Toumasheva, M. V. (2016). Economic growth in the conditions of resource constraints: ordinal approach to optimization of macroeconomic production structure. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, 11(3), 41.

Bobylev, S. N., & Khodzhaev, A. Sh. (2010). Economics of nature management. Moscow: INFRA-M.

Summers, J. K., & Smith, L. M. (2014). The role of social and intergenerational equity in making changes in human well-being sustainable. Ambio, 43(6), 718-728.

Baum, R. (2021). Sustainable development–a modern understanding of the concept. Annals of the Polish Association of Agricultural and Agribusiness Economists, 23(2), 9-29.

Grinin, L. E., Bilyuga, S. E., Korotayev, A. V., & Grinin, A. L. (2024). The age of the state and sociopolitical destabilization: preliminary results of the quantitative analysis. Dimensions, 15(42), 15.

Lee, H. K. (2015). Sacral socio-ecological community: theories of contemporary social catholicism and engaged Buddhism in complementary practice (Doctoral dissertation).

Vorontsova, E., Vorontsov, A., & Balashova, T. (2019). Ecological and legal support for the sustainable development of the Russian Federation. In International Scientific-Practical Conference “Business Cooperation as a Resource of Sustainable Economic Development and Investment Attraction”(ISPCBC 2019) (pp. 19-24). Atlantis Press.

Dasgupta, S., Hamilton, K., Pagiola, S., & Wheeler, D. (2008). Environmental economics at the World Bank. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy.

Osipov, V. I. (2019). Sustainable development: environmental aspects. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 89(4), 396-404.

Kolosova, T. V. (2011). Ensuring sustainable enterprise development based on increasing innovation potential (Doctoral dissertation abstract, Doctor of Economic Sciences, Specialty 08.00.05). Nizhny Novgorod.

Koryakov, A. G. (2012). Methodological issues of enterprise sustainable development. Economics and Law Issues, (4), 110–114.

Khudyakova, T. A. (2016). Analysis of modern scientific approaches to developing an integral indicator of enterprise sustainability. Bulletin of NGIEI, 12(67), 122–130.

Sisina, N. N. (2012). On methodological aspects of economic analysis of environmental activities during the transition to sustainable development. Bulletin of Saratov State Socio-Economic University, (2), 77–80.

Ursul, A. D., & Ursul, T. A. (Eds.). (2013). Sustainable development and security: A textbook. Moscow.

Kucherova, E. N. (n.d.). A modern approach to enterprise sustainable development [Electronic resource].

Karpova, O. K. (2010). Planning sustainable development of an industrial enterprise based on a process approach: Instrumental and methodological support (Doctoral dissertation abstract, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Specialty 08.00.05). Rostov-on-Don.

Melnik, T. E. (2009). Management of sustainable development of industrial enterprises using an effective integrated assessment indicator (Doctoral dissertation abstract, Candidate of Economic Sciences, Specialty 08.00.05). Orel.

Khomyachenkova, N. A. (2011). Mechanism for integrated assessment of industrial enterprise development sustainability (Doctoral dissertation abstract, Candidate of Economic Sciences). Moscow.

Dünhaupt, P., & Herr, H. (2020). Trade, global value chains and development – What role for national development banks? Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, 89(3), 9–33.

National Bank of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2019). On approval of the rules for classifying financial organizations as systemically important [Electronic resource]. Adilet Legal Information System.

President of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2023). On approval of the carbon neutrality strategy of the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2060 [Electronic resource].

Mukhamedkhanova, A., & Yelikbay, M. (2023). The role of innovation in sustainable development and improving the competitiveness of business structures in Kazakhstan. Rivista di Studi sulla Sostenibilità, 1, 139–151.

Ray, R., Gallagher, K. P., & Sanborn, C. A. (Eds.). (2019). Development banks and sustainability in the Andean Amazon (1st ed.). Routledge.

Published

2025-12-05

How to Cite

Zhanar , K. ., Yerlan , O. ., Marat , S. ., Saltanat , J. ., Dina , B. ., & Gulshat , Z. . (2025). An Empirical Study of the Impact of the Banking System on the Sustainable Development of the National Economy. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(4), 508–525. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n4a2085

Issue

Section

Articles