Didactic Foundations of Ecologization of Chemical Education in Higher Education Institutions

Laura Malikkyzy; Khairulla  Zhanbekov

doi:10.48161/qaj.v4n4a1315

Authors

Laura Malikkyzy Chemistry Department, Institute of Natural Science and Geography, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, 13 Dostyk Ave., Almaty, 050010, Kazakhstan;
Khairulla Zhanbekov Chemistry Department, Institute of Natural Science and Geography, Abai Kazakh National Pedagogical University, 13 Dostyk Ave., Almaty, 050000, Kazakhstan;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n4a1315

Abstract

The study addresses the need to enhance the didactic foundations of university-level chemical education by incorporating ecological principles. Its purpose is to develop a model that fosters ecological thinking among students. The primary research method used is diagnostic analysis. The article introduces a model designed to instill environmental values in students. This model evaluates the impact of chemical disciplines on environmental factors such as air, water, soil, atmosphere, climate, and vegetation. It employs cognitive and informational criteria to analyze and model responses to questions about these interactions. This study addresses the need to enhance the ecological focus in chemical education at universities by developing a didactic model that fosters environmental thinking among students. The research aims to create a framework that integrates ecological values into chemical disciplines by examining their impact on natural components such as air, water, and soil. The diagnostic method was used to design and test the model, which emphasizes cognitive and informational criteria. Key findings demonstrate that this approach helps students understand the environmental implications of chemical processes, equipping them to apply this knowledge in their future professional activities. The results highlight practical strategies for integrating ecological awareness into higher education curricula.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Demikhova, L. Y., & Chebotareva, I. V. (2018). Modern problems of ecological education of preschoolers. Regional Education: Modern Trends, 1(34), 101–105.

Dzyatkovskaya, E. N., Dlimbetova, G. K., & Zahlebnyj, A. N. (2020). Key issues in preparing environmental education concepts. Cennosti i smysly, (4), 141-155.

Ford, J. D., King, N., Galappaththi, E. K., Pearce, T., McDowell, G., & Harper, S. L. (2020). The resilience of indigenous peoples to environmental change. One Earth, 2(6), 532-543.

Derkach, T. M. (2018). Effectiveness of e-learning resources in physical chemistry teaching. Інформаційні технології і засоби навчання, (66,№ 4), 139-148.

Ferguson, P. (2019). Discourses of resilience in the climate security debate. Global Environmental Politics, 19(2), 104-126.

Nurdillayeva, R. N., & Zhuman, G. O. (2021). Application of the CLIL Method in the Classes of Inorganic Chemistry. Bull. Karaganda Univ. “Chem.” Ser, 102, 96-104.

Karolčík, Š., & Čipková, E. (2017). Attitudes among chemistry teachers towards increasing personal competencies in applying ICT. Chemistry-Didactics-Ecology-Metrology, 22(1-2), 99-121.

Sdikova, G. Z., & Nurlybaikyzy, G. (2016). The role of information technologies in teaching chemistry. Actualscience, 2(12), 217-218.

Gazina, O. M. (2017). Study of the problem of environmental education of preschoolers at Moscow State Pedagogical University. Pedagogical education and science, 6, 128-131.

Franco, I., Saito, O., Vaughter, P., Whereat, J., Kanie, N., & Takemoto, K. (2019). Higher education for sustainable development: Actioning the global goals in policy, curriculum and practice. Sustainability Science, 14(6), 1621-1642.

Balchugov, A. (2021). Randomization of experiments in chemical technology. Modern Technologies and Scientific and Technological Progress, 1(1), 5–6.

Haghi, A. K., Ribeiro, A. C. F., Pogliani, L., Balköse, D., Torrens, F., & Mukbaniani, O. V. (Eds.). (2017). Applied Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Volume 5: Research Methodologies in Modern Chemistry and Applied Science. CRC Press.

Joo, Y. J., Park, S., & Lim, E. (2018). Factors influencing preservice teachers’ intention to use technology: TPACK, teacher self-efficacy, and technology acceptance model. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 48-59.

Devi, L. (2020). A Study on Awareness about the Impact of National Education Policy-2020 Among the Stakeholder of Commerce and Management Disciplinary. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(6).

Borges, A. F., Coradini, N. H. K., & Morales, R. N. (2020). Podcast educational product for technical course of professional and technological education. Laplage in Journal, 6, 98-111.

Canbazoglu Bilici, S., Guzey, S. S., & Yamak, H. (2016). Assessing pre-service science teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through observations and lesson plans. Research in Science & Technological Education, 34(2), 237-251.

Özdilek, Z., & Robeck, E. C. (2018). Enabling pre-service chemistry teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK) through case-based lesson planning. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 32(1), 207-225.

Kaurav, R. P. S., Suresh, K. G., Narula, S., & Baber, R. (2020). New education policy: qualitative (contents) analysis and Twitter mining (sentiment analysis). Journal of content, community and communication, 12(1), 4-13.

Weissman, S. (2020). It is a different world. Diverse: Issues In Higher Education, 37(4), 10-12.

Lynch, J., Rowlands, J., Gale, T., & Parker, S. (Eds.). (2019). Practice methodologies in education research. Routledge.