Navigating Remote Learning:  A study on Student Perceptions During Times of Uncertainty

Sanad AL Maskari

doi:10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1482

Authors

Sanad AL-Maskari Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, Sohar University, Sohar 311, Sultanate of Oman.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1482

Abstract

Covid 19 pandemic impacted the global economy, operations and people daily lives. The pandemic has a ripple effect on student learning which in turn will impact global economy for years to come. As the Covid-19 pandemic forces educational institutions in several countries to transition from face-to-face instruction to emergency remote teaching, teachers and students face the daunting task of adapting their practices. This research investigated university student attitude toward learning from home while focusing on the Omani context. In addition, it is aspired to understand and analyze different factors affecting student attitudes toward remote learning including demographic factors, technology access, technology competencies, learning preference and technology usefulness. The study was conducted using an online remote learning pedagogy questionnaire designed using a five-point Likert scale. A total of 279 students participated in this study from various study levels. The study findings highlighted important elements that should be addressed by educational institutes when offering a remote learning experience. Firstly, student-teacher engagement is an essential part of remote learning. The ability for students to communicate seamlessly with their facilitator is a critical factor in promoting positive attitudes toward the remote learning process. Secondly, technology accessibility impact student’s perceptions and attitudes toward remote learning. Reliable and seamless access to the university learning platforms and online resources are critical success factor. Finally, offering students a variety of online learning resources activities and interactive materials can impact student satisfaction. Other factors influencing students’ attitudes toward remote learning includes previous online experience, online support services, access to technical support, collaboration, and digital curriculum design.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ehnts, D., & Paetz, M. (2021). Covid-19 and its economic consequences for the euro area. Eurasian Economic Review, 11, 227–249.

Rukhsar, S., Awan, M. J., Naseem, U., Zebari, D. A., Mohammed, M. A., Albahar, M. A., ... & Mahmoud, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence based sentence level sentiment analysis of COVID-19. Computer Systems Science and Engineering, 47(1), 791-807.

Nahar, V., Al-Maskari, S., Li, X., & Pang, C. (2014). Semi-supervised learning for cyberbullying detection in social networks. In Databases Theory and Applications: 25th Australasian Database Conference, ADC 2014, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, July 14-16, 2014 (pp. 160–171). Springer.

Al-Maskari, S., Hosseini, S., & Abusham, E. (2023). E-nose sensor applications and challenges in the health sector. In Intelligent Internet of Things for Smart Healthcare Systems (pp. 239–252).

Abusham, E., Ibrahim, B., Zia, K., & Al-Maskari, S. (2022). An integration of new digital image scrambling technique on PCA-based face recognition system. Scientific Programming, 2022(1), 2628885.

Al-Maskari, S., Xu, Z., Guo, W., Zhao, X., & Li, X. (2018). Bio-inspired learning approach for electronic nose. Computing, 100, 387–402.

Zebari, D. A., Sulaiman, D. M., Sadiq, S. S., Zebari, N. A., & Salih, M. S. (2022). Automated Detection of Covid-19 from X-ray Using SVM. In 2022 4th International Conference on Advanced Science and Engineering (ICOASE) (pp. 130-135). IEEE.

Kemp, A., Palmer, E., Strelan, P., & Thompson, H. (2024). Testing a novel extended educational technology acceptance model using student attitudes towards virtual classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology.

Zhang, J., Ding, Y., Yang, X., Zhong, J., Qiu, X., Zou, Z., Xu, Y., Jin, X., Wu, X., & Huang, J. (2022). Covid-19’s impacts on the scope, effectiveness, and interaction characteristics of online learning: A social network analysis. PLOS One, 17(8), 0273016.

Wang, Y., Liu, X., & Zhang, Z. (2018). An overview of e-learning in China: History, challenges, and opportunities. Research in Comparative and International Education, 13(1), 195–210.

Basilaia, G., Dgebuadze, M., Kantaria, M., & Chokhonelidze, G. (2020). Replacing the classic learning form at universities as an immediate response to the Covid-19 virus infection in Georgia. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 8(3), 101–108.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319–340.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

Rogers, E. M., Singhal, A., & Quinlan, M. M. (2014). Diffusion of innovations. In An Integrated Approach to Communication Theory and Research (pp. 432–448). Routledge.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1977). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research.

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 425–478.

Toros, E., Asiksoy, G., & Sürücü, L. (2024). Refreshment students’ perceived usefulness and attitudes towards using technology: A moderated mediation model. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–10.

Hartley, K., & Bendixen, L. D. (2001). Educational research in the internet age: Examining the role of individual characteristics. Educational Researcher, 30(9), 22–26.

Adouani, Y., & Khenissi, M. A. (2024). Investigating computer science students' intentions towards the use of an online educational platform using an extended technology acceptance model (e-TAM): An empirical study at a public university in Tunisia. Education and Information Technologies, 29(12), 14621-14645.

Hayat, A. A., Barzegar, N., Dehsorkhi, H. F., Keshavarzi, M. H., Azimnejadian, M., Rostami, S., & Mokhtarpour, S. (2024). A cross-sectional study on the role of computer anxiety in students' online learning. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 12(1), 51.

Zhang, F., Xia, Y., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Xia, J., & Chen, C. C. (2025). A mixed methods study of adult learners’ online learning motivation profiles. Education and Information Technologies, 1–26.

Thi, H. P., Tran, Q. N., La, L. G., Doan, H. M., & Vu, T. D. (2023). Factors motivating students’ intention to accept online learning in emerging countries: The case study of Vietnam. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 15(2), 324–341.

Brown, T., Zoghi, M., Williams, B., Jaberzadeh, S., Roller, L., Palermo, C., et al. (2009). Are learning style preferences of health science students predictive of their attitudes towards e-learning? Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(4).

Seyal, A. H., & Rahman, M. N. A. (2015). Understanding learning styles, attitudes and intentions in using e-learning system: Evidence from Brunei. World Journal of Education, 5(3), 61–72.

Yang, P., & Qian, S. (2025). The factors affecting students’ behavioral intentions to use e-learning for educational purposes: A study of physical education students in China. SAGE Open, 15(1), 21582440251313654.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98.

Auerswald, M., & Moshagen, M. (2019). How to determine the number of factors to retain in exploratory factor analysis: A comparison of extraction methods under realistic conditions. Psychological Methods, 24(4), 468.

Çokluk B., Bökéoğlu, O., & Koçak, D. (2016). Using Horn’s parallel analysis method in exploratory factor analysis for determining the number of factors. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 16(2).

Koohang, A., & Du Plessis, J. (2004). Architecting usability properties in the e-learning instructional design process. International Journal on E-Learning, 3(3), 38–44.

Nikou, S., & Maslov, I. (2023). Finnish university students’ satisfaction with e-learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(1), 1–21.

Zhou, L., Wu, S., Zhou, M., & Li, F. (2020). ‘School’s out, but class’ on, the largest online education in the world today: Taking China’s practical exploration during the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control as an example. Best Evidence in Chinese Education, 4(2), 501–519.

Al Doghan, M. A., & Piaralal, S. K. (2024). Exploring the impact of e-learning initiatives on students' self-efficacy and e-learning experiences. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 109(109), 158-176.

Christakis, D. A., Moreno, M. M., Jelenchick, L., Myaing, M. T., & Zhou, C. (2011). Problematic internet usage in U.S. college students: A pilot study. BMC Medicine, 9(1), 1–6.

Jelenchick, L. A., Eickhoff, J., Christakis, D. A., Brown, R. L., Zhang, C., Benson, M., & Moreno, M. A. (2014). The problematic and risky internet use screening scale (PRIUSS) for adolescents and young adults: Scale development and refinement. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 171–178.

Kim, S. Y., Kim, M. S., Park, B., Kim, J. H., & Choi, H. G. (2017). The associations between internet use time and school performance among Korean adolescents differ according to the purpose of internet use. PLOS One, 12(4), 0174878.

Tzavara, A., Lavidas, K., Komis, V., Misirli, A., Karalis, T., & Papadakis, S. (2023). Using personal learning environments before, during and after the pandemic: The case of “e-me.” Education Sciences, 13(1), 87.

Papadakis, S., Kiv, A. E., Kravtsov, H., Osadchyi, V. V., Marienko, M. V., Pinchuk, O. P., ... & Semerikov, S. O. (2023). Revolutionizing education: Using computer simulation and cloud-based smart technology to facilitate successful open learning. In Joint Proceedings of the 10th Illia O. Teplytskyi Workshop on Computer Simulation in Education, and Workshop on Cloud-Based Smart Technologies for Open Education (CoSinEi and CSTOE 2022) co-located with ACNS Conference on Cloud and Immersive Technologies (No. 3358, pp. 1-18). CEUR Workshop Proceedings.

Papadakis, S. (2023). MOOCs 2012-2022: An overview. Advances in Mobile Learning Educational Research, 3(1), 682-693.

Su, F., Zou, D., Wang, L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). Student engagement and teaching presence in blended learning and emergency remote teaching. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(2), 445-470.

Huang, F., Ge, X., Li, Y., & Tang, Z. (2025). Unveiling unwillingness to communicate among EFL learners in flipped learning: An ecological perspective. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1-15.