Fostering Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Capacity to Employ an Interactive Learning Tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n1a1530Abstract
This investigation examined the efficacy of a researcher-designed course intended to bolster primary student-teachers’ capabilities in leveraging interactive learning through a smart voice device Alisa, the ubiquitous physical device popular among Russian-speaking demographics. An embedded mixed design was adopted, integrating qualitative explorations within a predominantly quantitative framework. Over ten weeks, 37 pre-service elementary teachers engaged in a program structured around interactive learning principles, Alisa classroom implementation, and microteaching sessions. Eventually, the teachers-in-training demonstrated notable advancement in crafting interactive, technology-enriched lesson plans. Furthermore, there was a step up in their teaching self-efficacy, with participants expressing increased confidence in harnessing the smart speaker. Semi-structured interviews revealed three primary deterrents encountered during the intervention: troubleshooting technical expectancies, puzzling over effectively embodying Alisa into relevant activities, and the considerable time investment required for planning interactive lessons with the voice-controlled assistants. By evaluating the potential pros and cons of integrating smart speakers into education, this study sets the stage for future inquiries. The findings foreground the potential of incorporating natural conversation assistants into primary teacher education programs while also pointing to the necessity of addressing the hurdles identified herein.
Downloads
References
Purwar, D., Flacke, J., & Sliuzas, R. (2024). Improving community understanding of cascading effects of critical infrastructure service failure: An experimental interactive learning process. Progress in Disaster Science, 100383.
Getman, A., & Pekeleu, M. (2024). Maximising academic achievement in online learning: The role of student-content engagement strategies and profiles. Interactive Learning Environments. Advance online publication.
Efe, H., & Topsakal, Ü. U. (2024). A meta-synthesis study in interactive learning environments: Digital games in health education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(4), 1319–1329.
Roque-Hernández, R. V., López-Mendoza, A., & Salazar-Hernandez, R. (2024). Perceived instructor presence, interactive tools, student engagement, and satisfaction in hybrid education post-COVID-19 lockdown in Mexico. Heliyon, 10(6), e27342.
Kong, S., & Wang, Y. (2024). The impact of school support for professional development on teachers’ adoption of student-centered pedagogy, students’ cognitive learning and abilities: A three-level analysis. Computers and Education, 215, 105016.
Suparman, S., La’ia, H. T., Parinters Makur, A., Turmudi, T., Juandi, D., Helsa, Y., & Masniladevi, M. (2024). Development of Ucing Sumput digital game to stabilize students’ achievement emotions in mathematics. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(4), 156–177.
Nguyen, L. A. T., & Habók, A. (2024). Tools for assessing teacher digital literacy: A review. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(1), 305–346.
Zhang, M. (2024). Enhancing self-regulation and learner engagement in L2 speaking: Exploring the potential of intelligent personal assistants within a learning-oriented feedback framework. BMC Psychology, 12, 421.
Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2024). Exploring factors influencing students’ intention to use intelligent personal assistants for learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(8), 4049–4062.
Rad, H. S. (2024). Revolutionizing L2 speaking proficiency, willingness to communicate, and perceptions through artificial intelligence: A case of Speeko application. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(4), 364–379.
Hobert, S., & Berens, F. (2024). Developing a digital tutor as an intermediary between students, teaching assistants, and lecturers. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(2), 797–818.
Karlsson, G., & Nilsson, P. (2023). Capturing student teachers’ TPACK by using T-CoRe and video-annotation as self-reflective tools for flexible learning in teacher education. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 32(2), 223–237.
Mikeska, J. N., Howell, H., & Kinsey, D. (2023). Inside the black box: How elementary teacher educators support preservice teachers in preparing for and learning from online simulated teaching experiences. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122, 103979.
Stumbrienė, D., Jevsikova, T., & Kontvainė, V. (2024). Key factors influencing teachers’ motivation to transfer technology-enabled educational innovation. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 1697–1731.
Chou, C., & Wei, H. (2024). A tale of two formats: Graduate students’ perceptions and preferences of interactivity in responsible conduct of research education. Accountability in Research. Advance online publication.
Ploetzner, R. (2024). The effectiveness of enhanced interaction features in educational videos: A meta-analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(5), 1597–1612.
Teng, M. F. (2024). Metacognition and autonomy in building a community for language learning through VR digital gaming. Computers and Education X Reality, 4, 100060.
Lehikko, A., Nykänen, M., Lukander, K., Uusitalo, J., & Ruokamo, H. (2024). Exploring interactivity effects on learners’ sense of agency, cognitive load, and learning outcomes in immersive virtual reality: A mixed methods study. Computers and Education X Reality, 4, 100066.
Hu, J., Huang, Z., Li, J., Xu, L., & Zou, Y. (2024). Real-time classroom behavior analysis for enhanced engineering education: An AI-assisted approach. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems, 17(1), 167.
Ordu, Y., Aydogan, S., & Caliskan, N. (2024). The effect of interactive learning method on nursing students’ learning of movement requirement: A randomized controlled study. Nurse Education Today, 137, 106163.
Alsaeed, M. S., & Aladil, M. K. (2024). Digital and physical interactive learning environments: Early childhood mathematics teachers’ beliefs about technology through reflective writing. Education Sciences, 14(5), 517.
Ardaç, H. A., & Erdoğmuş, P. (2024). Question answering system with text mining and deep networks. Evolving Systems, 15, 1787–1799.
König, C. M., Karrenbauer, C., & Breitner, M. H. (2024). Development guidelines for individual digital study assistants in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 9.
Ortega-Ochoa, E., Arguedas, M., & Daradoumis, T. (2023). Empathic pedagogical conversational agents: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 886–909.
Chen, H. H., Yang, C. T., & Lai, K. K. (2020). Investigating college EFL learners’ perceptions toward the use of Google Assistant for foreign language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(3), 1335–1350.
Jnr, A. B. (2024). Examining the use of intelligent conversational voice-assistants for improved mobility behavior of older adults in smart cities. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction. Advance online publication.
Bräuer, P., & Mazarakis, A. (2024). How to design audio-gamification for language learning with Amazon Alexa? – A long-term field experiment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 40(9), 2343–2360.
Song, Y., Wong, R. C., & Zhao, X. (2024). Speech-to-SQL: Toward speech-driven SQL query generation from natural language question. VLDB Journal, 33, 1179–1201.
Wu, J., Li, Y., Zhou, J., & Chen, S. (2024). The impact of intelligent personal assistants on Mandarin second language learners: Interaction process, acquisition of listening and speaking ability. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication.
Tai, T. Y., & Chen, H. H. J. (2024). The impact of intelligent personal assistants on adolescent EFL learners’ listening comprehension. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(3), 433–460.
Yang, C. T. Y., Lai, S. L., & Chen, H. H. J. (2024). The impact of intelligent personal assistants on learners’ autonomous learning of second language listening and speaking. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(5), 2175–2195.
Lyublinskaya, I., & Kaplon-Schilis, A. (2022). Analysis of differences in the levels of TPACK: Unpacking performance indicators in the TPACK Levels Rubric. Education Sciences, 12(2), 79.
Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2020). Effects of a professional development program for teaching mathematics with technology on teachers’ beliefs, self-efficacy and practices. ZDM Mathematics Education, 52(7), 1411–1422.
Spaan, W., Oostdam, R., Schuitema, J., & Pijls, M. (2024). Analysing teacher behaviour in synthesizing hands-on and minds-on during practical work. Research in Science and Technological Education, 42(2), 219–236.
Choi, L. J. (2024). Pre-service English teachers’ beliefs and practices in the use of digital technology: The case of a technology-enhanced teacher preparation course in South Korea. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching. Advance online publication.
Gordon, D., Bourke, T., Mills, R., & Blundell, C. N. (2024). Understanding how education reform influences pre-service teachers’ teacher self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7, 100338.
Butler, L., & Starkey, L. (2024). OK Google, help me learn: An exploratory study of voice-activated artificial intelligence in the classroom. Technology Pedagogy and Education, 33(2), 135–148.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Qubahan Academic Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.