Instructional Technology Classroom Integration and Math Scores of the Fifth Grade Students
This study examined the instructional technology integration and Mathematics scores of 5th grade students in PARCC state assessment in school district of Maryland, USA. Constructed in the theoretical framework of Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Use Of Technology (UTAUT) by Venkatesh, Morris, Davis and Davis (2003), key variables that significantly contributes to outputs and the conceptual framework had been designed in the context of socio-demographic characteristics, instructional technology utilization, content delivery for mastery, and behavioral intentions to assess students mathematics performance through the use of instructional technology. Using descriptive and correlational designs, respondents were 91 students and 8 teachers participated in the study. Results revealed that instructional technology utilization played significant role in the teaching and learning process. The amount of time in using technology along with the socio-demographic characteristics such as area of specialization and educational attainment of parents were found to be positive predictors to students’ mathematics achievement. Further in depth study on what procedure that contributes to student learning in mathematics whether learning the software process of computation versus manual calculation had been recommended.
Akbar, F. (2013). What affects students’ acceptance and use of technology? Dietrich College Honors Theses. Carnegie Mellon University
Allsopp, D. H., McHatton, P., & Farmer, J. L. (2010). Technology, mathematics ps/rti, and students with ld: What do we know, what have we tried, and what can we do to improve outcomes now and in the future. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(4), 273-288.
Birch, A. and Irvine, V. (2010). “Preservice teachers’ acceptance of ICT integration in the classroom: applying the UTAUT model”, Educational Media International, 46 (4) 295-315.
Carter, A., Cotton, S. R., Gibson, P., O’Neal, L. J., Simoni, Z., Stringer, K., & Watkins, L. S. (2013). Integrating Computing Across the Curriculum: Incorporating Technology. Transforming K-12 classrooms with digital technology, 165.
Choy, B. H. (2014). Teachers' productive mathematical noticing during lesson preparation. In C. Nicol, P. Liljedahl, S. Oesterle & D. Allan (Eds.), Proceedings of the joint meeting of PME 38 and PME-NA, 36 (2) 297-304.
Compeau, D. R., and Higgins, C. A. (2015). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS quarterly, 189-211.
Delen, E., & Bulut, O. (2011) The Relationship Between Students' Exposure to Technology
and their Achievement in Science and Math. Turkish Online Journal of EducationalTechnology, 2011 - 220.127.116.11
Evans, B. R. (2011). Content Knowledge, Attitudes and Self-Efficacy in the Mathematics New York City Teaching Fellows (NYCTF) Program.School Science and Mathematics, 111(5), 225-235.
Hidayati, K. &Budiyono, S.(2018).Development and Validation of Student's Responsibility Scale on Mathematics Learning Using Subject Scaling Model.International Journal of Instruction, 11 (4) 499-512.
Hill, H., & Ball, D. L. (2014). Learning mathematics for teaching: Results from California’s mathematics professional development institutes. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 35(5), 330–351.
Huang, X., Craig, S. D., Xie, J., Graesser, A. C., Okwumabua, T. (2018). The Relationship between Gender, Ethnicity, and Technology on the Impact of Mathematics Achievement in an After-School Program.Society for Research on Educational Effectiveness,2(1) 34-45.
Israel, O. 'N.(2016). Effects of Mathematics Innovation and Technology on Students Performance in Open and Distance Learning.Research in Pedagogy, 6 (1) 66-75.
Kuppalapalle, V. and Tammy, M. (2016). Integration of Digital Technology and Innovative Strategies for Learning and Teaching Large Classes: A Calculus Case Study. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2 (2), 379-395.
Lim, C. and Khine, M. (2006) Managing Teachers' Barriers to ICT Integration in Singapore Schools. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 14 (1) 97-125.
Mardiana, H. (2018). Lecturer's Attitude towards Advance Technology and Its Impact to the Learning Process: Case Study in Tangerang City Campuses. Journal of Educational Science and Technology ,4 (1), 12-25.
Meagher, M. (2012).Students' relationship to technology and conceptions of mathematics while learning in a computer algebra system environment. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 19 (1), 3-16.
Muhaimin, Asrial, Habibi A, Mukminin A, Hadisaputra P. (2020). Science teachers' integration of digital resources in education: A survey in rural areas of one Indonesian province. Heliyon, ;6(8):e04631. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04631. PMID: 32793838; PMCID: PMC7408340.
Mulyono, H., Bátyi, S., & Mukminin, A. (2023). An Analysis of EFL Teachers’ digital creativity and its relation to their instructional creativity: A case of Indonesian primary and secondary schools. Journal of Asia TEFL, 20(3), 582–597.
Murphy, D. (2016). A Literature Review: The Effect of Implementing Technology in a High School Mathematics Classroom. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 2 (2), 294-299.
Nicholas, H., & Ng, W. (2012).Factors influencing the uptake of a mechatronics curriculum initiative in five Australian secondary schools.International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 22(1), 6590.doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10798-010-9138-0
Oginni, N.I.(2015). Effects of mathematics innovation and technology on students performance in open and distance learning. International Journal of Research in Education and Science,2 (4), 60-75.
Oyebolu, S. and Olusiji O. (2013) The Impact of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on Vocational and Technical Students’ Learning.Journal of Education and Practice ,4 (7), 23-39.
Parkay, F. W., Anctil, E. J., & Hass, G. (2014). Curriculum leadership: Readings for developing quality educational programs (10th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Prasojo L. D., Habibi A, Mohd Yaakob MF, Pratama R, Yusof MR, Mukminin A, Suyanto, Hanum F. (2020). Teachers' burnout: A SEM analysis in an Asian context. Heliyon, 6(1):e03144. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03144. PMID: 31938746; PMCID: PMC6953709.
Rakimahwati, Ismet, S., Zainul, R., Roza, D., & Mukminin, A. (2022). The Development of the Educational Game to Improve Logical/ Mathematical Intelligence. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(7). https://doi.org/10.33423/jhetp.v22i7.5266
Rosas, C., & Campbell, L. (2010). Who's teaching math to our most needy students? A descriptive study. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33 (2), 102-113.
Susanti, N., Hadiyanto, & Mukminin, A. (2022). The effects of TPACK Instrument variables on teacher candidates in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 2(2), 107–115.
Tella, A. (2017). Teacher variables as predictors of academic achievement of primary school pupils’ mathematics.International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education.1 (1), 16-33.
Umugiraneza, O.,Bansilal, S.&North, D.(2018). Exploring Teachers' Use of Technology in Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Kwazulu-Natal Schools, Pythagoras, 39 (1) 342-350.
Velasco, E.V., Ibarra, F.P., & Mukminin, A. (2022). The Readiness on the Implementation of the Special Program for Information and Communication Technology. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22(3), 79–89.
Wenglinsky, H. (2005) Technology and Achievement: The Bottom Line. Learning in the Digital (63), 29-32. Retrieved from https://imoberg.com/files/Technology_and_Achievement_--The_Bottom_Line_Wenglinsky_H._.pdf
Yu-Liang, T. (2011).Introducing new technology to teachers: A pilot evaluation.International Journal of Technology in Teaching & Learning, 7 (2), 136-151.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Qubahan Academic Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.