Development of a Character-Based Debate, Analysis and Findings Learning Model Integrated with Digital Life Skill Technology in Elementary Schools in Indonesia

Authors

  • Apdoludin Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo, Muara Bungo 37211, Indonesia;
  • Elfa Eriyani Department of Indonesian Language and Literature, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Merangin, Bangko 37314, Indonesia.
  • Ahmad Ridhoh Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo, Muara Bungo 37211, Indonesia;
  • Dexza Isma Putri Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo, Muara Bungo 37211, Indonesia;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n4a2042

Keywords:

development, character-based debate analysis and findings (C-DAF), learning model, digital life skill technology (DLST).

Abstract

 The principal issues in this take a look at are restrained studying resources, low human resources, low critical thinking skills and mastery of digital technology of students and weak character possessed by students. This examines targets to decide the validity, practicality and effectiveness and experiments of the integrated with Character-Based Debate, Analysis and Findings (C-DAF) learning model integrated with Digital Life Skill Technology (DLST) developed. This study is a development research or Research and Development (R&D). The populace of this has a look at have been basic college college students in Bungo Regency, Jambi Province, Indonesia as many as 124 students. The sampling technique used changed into easy random sampling. The sample in this observe amounted to 50 college students. information series techniques are model validation sheets, observations, interviews, questionnaires, and tests. The validity instrument used in this study is content validity by consulting with experts. This experimental study aims to compare critical thinking skills, science skills, students' analytical skills and learning outcomes between the two groups, namely the pre-test and post-test control groups. The reliability test in this study used a Likert scale. The calculation results show that the reliability of the instrument is 74 with a percentage of 92.5% (good) by learning model design experts. 63 with a percentage of 78.75% (good) by language experts. 76 with a percentage of 95% (good) by material experts and 2880 with a percentage of 89.51% (strongly agree) by students. The data analysis technique uses the t-test. The results of the t-test calculation show that the t-count score is greater than the t table (th: 4.276 > tt: 1.994). This shows that (1) The C-DAF learning model integrated with DLST students' thinking skills, trains students' skills and is able to help students analyze learning in depth. 2) Through the (C-DAF) model, teachers are helped in the classroom so that learning takes place more systematically implemented and is significant in improving student understanding, and (3) Learning with the C-DAF learning model integrated with DFLST can make learning more effective. Researchers who are interested in continuing the development of the C-DAF learning model integrated with DLST, should pay attention to the limitations of the research, so that they can further refine the model that has been developed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Senior, C., & Sahlberg, P. (2025). The evolution of the OECD’s position on equity in global education. International Journal of Educational Development, 114, 103241.

Madhakomala, R., Hakim, M. A., & Syifauzzuhrah, N. (2022). Problems of education in Indonesia and alternative solutions. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 3(3), 135–144.

Asadullah, M. N., Jilani, A. H., Negara, S. D., & Suryadarma, D. (2025). Improving the quality of basic education in ASEAN: Emerging challenges and reforms. International Journal of Educational Development, 116, 103292.

Sukmayadi, V., & Yahya, A. H. (2020). Indonesian education landscape and the 21st century challenges. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(4), 219–234.

Chan, C. (2019). Indonesia’s higher education systems. Australia–Indonesia Centre.

Bangkara, B. M. A. S. A., Pattiasina, P. J., Fatmawati, E., Heryani, A., & Damayanto, A. (2022). Relevance of education policy and implementation in Indonesia. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6, 216–232.

Akhir, M. (2021). The implementation of character education in Indonesian language learning. Jurnal Etika Demokrasi, 6(2), 329–338.

Shaturaev, J. (2021). Education in Indonesia: Financing, challenges of quality and academic results in primary education. Kokand University Herald.

World Bank. (2014). Tertiary education in Indonesia: Directions for policy. World Bank.

Hwang, Y., & Lee, J. H. (2025). Exploring students’ experiences and perceptions of human–AI collaboration in digital content making. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

Apdoludin, Megawati, Putra, R. E., Harianto, D., Pudjaningsih, W., & Eriyani, E. (2024). The impacts of analysis, debate, and finding models on learning natural sciences. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(3), 166–174.

Apdoludin, & Martinisyamin. (2022). Modeling analysis, findings, development, organizing the material, and learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(1), 25–36.

Mudinillah, A., Kuswandi, D., & Hermansah, S. (2024). Optimizing project-based learning in developing 21st-century skills. Journal of Educational Studies, 4(2), 86–101.

Atmojo, E., Lukitoaji, D., Rahmawati, D., Anggriani, D., & Anindya, A. (2025). Effects of hybrid STEM learning on 21st-century skills and character development. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(2), 384–401.

Apdoludin, Guswita, R., Andriani, D., & Isma, D. (2024). Development of a debate learning model based on digital life skills. Journal of Educational Research, 8(2), 701–716.

Apdoludin, Guswita, R., & Andriani, D. (2024). Model pembelajaran debat, analisis, dan temuan (DAT) berbasis digital life skill. Tangguh Denara Jaya.

Hernández-González, J., & Pérez, A. (2022). On the relative value of weak supervision for learning generative models. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 150, 258–272.

Habibi, A., Sofyan, S., & Mukminin, A. (2023). Factors affecting digital technology access in vocational education. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 1–12.

Wardana, L. A., Rulyansah, A., Izzuddin, A., & Nuriyanti, R. (2022). Integration of digital and non-digital learning media post-pandemic. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(1), 211–222.

Walker, S., Tikly, L., Strong, K., Wallace, D., & Soudien, C. (2023). Educational reparations: Addressing racial injustices in SDG 4. International Journal of Educational Development, 103, 102933.

Li, J., et al. (2022). Identification and diagnosis of meniscus tear using deep learning. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 34, 91–101.

Burnett, N., & Jenkins, R. (2025). An urgent lesson plan to fix international education aid. International Journal of Educational Development, 117, 103331.

Premsagar, P., Aldous, C., Esterhuizen, T. M., Gomes, B. J., Gaskell, J. W., & Tabb, D. L. (2022). Comparing statistical models and machine learning in cardiac patients. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 34, 101103.

Akıncıoğlu, M. (2025). Reforming EMI in higher education. International Journal of Educational Development, 115.

Herzog né Hoffmann, C., Vollmer, F., Gruner, J., & Rostalski, P. (2022). Teaching estimation and control via probabilistic graphical models. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 55(17), 206–211.

Apdoludin, Eriyani, Ridoh, & Putri. (2025). Model pembelajaran: Integrasi karakter dan digital life skill. CV Edupedia.

Apdoludin. (2023). Belajar dan pembelajaran berbasis scientific. Deepublish.

Bedasso, B., & Mendez Acosta, A. (2025). Teacher attrition in Burkina Faso. International Journal of Educational Development, 113, 103228.

Susanto, E., et al. (2023). Model-model pembelajaran: Prinsip, konsep, dan aplikasi. CV Edupedia.

Apdoludin, A., Lestari, U., & Habibie, Z. R. (2023). Application of the AFDOML learning model. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 8(1), 164–169.

Apdoludin. (2024). Model-model pembelajaran berbasis scientific approach. Lakeisha.

Apdoludin. (2021). Inovasi baru model pembelajaran: Model debat, analisis, dan temuan (DAT). Intishar Publishing.

Dantas, L. A., & Cunha, A. (2020). Learning styles and the learning process. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2(1), 100017.

Cariñanos-Ayala, S., Arrue, M., Zarandona, J., & Labaka, A. (2021). Structured debate as a teaching strategy in nursing education. Nurse Education Today, 98, 104766.

Cole, J. D., Ruble, M. J., Povlak, A., Nettle, P., Sims, K., & Choyce, B. (2020). Self-directed learning through journal club debates. Health Professions Education, 6(4), 594–604.

Suryani, N. Y., Rizal, S., Rohani, T., & Ratnaningsih, H. (2024). Improving English writing skills through digital technology. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 8(1), 21–34.

Buchner, J., Rüter, M., & Kerres, M. (2022). Learning with a digital escape room game. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1).

Sunday, O. J., Adesope, O. O., & Maarhuis, P. L. (2021). Smartphone addiction and learning: A meta-analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 4, 100114.

Alakrash, H. M., & Razak, N. A. (2021). Technology-based language learning. Sustainability, 13(21).

Ursavaş, Ö. F., Yalçın, Y., İslamoğlu, H., Bakır-Yalçın, E., & Cukurova, M. (2025). Generative AI adoption in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1).

Sailer, M., Murböck, J., & Fischer, F. (2021). Digital learning beyond technology. Teaching and Teacher Education, 103, 103346.

Sentriyo, I., Sumarna, N., Rabani, L., & Arisanti, W. O. L. (2023). Integration of digital technology through PBL. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 2266–2274.

Merta, L. W. S., Ratminingsih, N. M., & Budasi, I. G. (2023). Technology integration in English language teaching. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 17(2), 333–341.

Arynova, Z., et al. (2025). Sustainable development strategies in the context of digitalization. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(3), 385–397.

McGrath, S., & Yamada, S. (2023). Skills for development and vocational education. International Journal of Educational Development, 102, 102853.

Lau, L. C. M., et al. (2022). Image-based machine learning for knee arthroplasty. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 36, 177–183.

Tamondong, M. C., et al. (2023). Educators’ readiness for online distance learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23(19), 242–252.

McCowan, T. (2023). Higher education and the SDGs. International Journal of Educational Development, 103, 102945.

Bell, S. (2025). District education office work in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 113, 103219.

Mesra, R. (2023). Research and development dalam pendidikan. PT Mifandi Mandiri Digital.

Sari, M. N., et al. (2024). Metodologi penelitian tindakan kelas dan R&D.

Winaryati, E., et al. (2021). Circular model of R&D pendidikan dan sosial. KBM Indonesia.

Prahmana, R. C. I. (2017). Design research: Teori dan implementasinya. Rajagrafindo Persada.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Rohmad. (2017). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi dan penelitian. Kalimedia.

Firdaus, M., & Wilujeng, I. (2018). Development of guided inquiry worksheets. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 26–40.

Sahir, S. H. (2022). Metodologi penelitian.

Fiantika, F. R., et al. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif.

Ermawati, D., Hilyana, F. S., & Ardana, L. (2024). STEM-based DIGASS application. Indonesian Research Journal in Education, 8(1), 134–144.

Farhana, H., Awiria, & Muttaqien, N. (2019). Penelitian tindakan kelas. Harapan Cerdas.

Nanda, I., et al. (2021). Penelitian tindakan kelas untuk guru inspiratif. Penerbit Adab.

Juliandi, A. (2020). Classroom action research. Deepublish.

Muñoz del Río, A., Casero-Alonso, V., & Amo-Salas, M. (2024). Robust experimental design methodology. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 247, 105104.

Ruzafa-Martínez, M., et al. (2023). Effectiveness of flipped classroom methodology. Nurse Education Today, 128, 105878.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed methods procedures. SAGE.

Amruddin. (2022). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Pradina Pustaka.

Abdullah, K., et al. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif.

Supratiknya, A. (2015). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dalam psikologi. Sanata Dharma University Press.

Hardani, Auliya, N. H., Andriani, H., & Fardani, R. A. (2020). Metode penelitian kualitatif dan kuantitatif. CV Pustaka Ilmu.

Apdoludin, A. K., et al. (2024). Classroom action research. Lakeisha.

Cameron, L. M., et al. (2025). Localizing education development research. International Journal of Educational Development, 113, 103207.

Rollan, K. (2024). NGO engagement in inclusive education reform. International Journal of Educational Development, 111, 103167.

Ducrot, S., et al. (2025). Reading problems in French overseas departments. International Journal of Educational Development, 115.

Zhou, X. (2025). University library platform service digitalization. International Journal of Educational Development, 115, 103269.

Mamanazarov, S., et al. (2025). Human capital development through digital transformation. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(3), 78–113.

Phani, K. R., & Mukul, K. (2024). Process innovation strategies in IT firms. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(1), 321–340.

Published

2025-12-29

How to Cite

Apdoludin, A., Eriyani , E. ., Ridhoh , A. ., & Isma Putri , D. . (2025). Development of a Character-Based Debate, Analysis and Findings Learning Model Integrated with Digital Life Skill Technology in Elementary Schools in Indonesia . Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(4), 723–742. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v5n4a2042

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)