The Impacts of the Analysis, Debate, and Finding Models on Learning Natural Sciences

Apdoludin Apdoludin; Megawati Megawati; Randi  Eka Putra; Dodi  Harianto; Wiwik  Pudjaningsih; Elfa  Eriyani

doi:10.48161/qaj.v4n3a189

Authors

Apdoludin Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo, 37211, Indonesia;
Megawati Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo, 37211, Indonesia;
Randi Eka Putra Department of Elementary Teacher Education, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Muara Bungo, 37211, Indonesia;
Dodi Harianto Department of Islamic Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin, Jambi, 36361, Indonesia;
Wiwik Pudjaningsih Department of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Computer Science and Education, Universitas Ngudi Waluyo, 50513, Indonesia;
Elfa Eriyani Department of Indonesian Language and Literature, Universitas Merangin, 37314, Indonesia;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a189

Abstract

Problem solving of low critical thinking skills, difficulty in practicing science skills, analyzing students' concepts in depth and low learning outcomes are serious problems that must be solved. This experimental study aims to compare critical thinking skills, science skills, students' analytical skills and learning outcomes between the two groups, namely the pre-test and post-test control groups. This study involved 26 students of grade 5 SDN 196/II Taman Agung, Bathin III District, Bungo Regency, totaling 26 students. The results showed that students had critical thinking skills, practicing science skills, and analyzing students' concepts in depth who believed that knowledge related to the material must be justified in various ways that showed broader and positive epistemics as evidenced by a significant increase in the science learning outcomes of grade 5 students of SDN 196/II Taman Agung, Bathin III District, Bungo Regency with a learning model of debate, analysis, and findings through experimental methods.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Premsagar, P., Aldous, C., Esterhuizen, T. M., Gomes, B. J., Gaskell, J. W., & Tabb, D. L. (2022). Comparing conventional statistical models and machine learning in a small cohort of South African cardiac patients. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked, 34, 101103.

Staddon, R. V. (2022). A supported flipped learning model for mathematics gives safety nets for online and blended learning. Computers & Education Open, 3, 100106.

Habibi, A., Sofyan, S., & Mukminin, A. (2023). Factors affecting digital technology access in vocational education. Scientific Reports, 13, 1–12.

Tamondong, M. C., Gaboy, R. G., Mukminin, A., Collantes, L. M., Santos, M. R. H. M. D., Ibanez, E. C., et al. (2023). Evaluating educators’ attitudes, skills readiness, and teaching performance on online distance learning. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 23, 242–252.

Chang, Z., Catani, F., Huang, F., Liu, G., Meena, S. R., Huang, J., et al. (2022). Landslide susceptibility prediction using slope unit-based machine learning models considering the heterogeneity of conditioning factors. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering.

Hadiyanto, Mukminin, A., Failasofah, A., Fajaryani, N., & Habibi, A. (2017). In search of quality student teachers in a digital era: Reframing the practices of soft skills in teacher education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 16, 70–77.

Paneque, M., Roldán-García, M. del M., & García-Nieto, J. (2023). e-LION: Data integration semantic model to enhance predictive analytics in e-Learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 213, 118892.

Freitas, R. S. M., Lima, Á. P. F., Chen, C., Rochinha, F. A., Mira, D., & Jiang, X. (2022). Towards predicting liquid fuel physicochemical properties using molecular dynamics guided machine learning models. Fuel, 329, 125415.

Kortland, K., & Klaassen, K. (2010). Designing theory-based teaching-learning sequences for science education.

Cyntha, B., Pareja, F. P., Ibarra, A. M., Marzulina, L., & Harto, K. H. M. (2023). Instructional technology classroom integration and math scores of the fifth grade students. Qubahan Academic Journal, 3, 206–218.

Mudinillah, A., Kuswandi, D., & Hermansah, S. (2024). Optimizing project-based learning in developing 21st century skills: A future education perspective. Future Education, 4, 86–101.

Hernández-González, J., & Pérez, A. (2022). On the relative value of weak information of supervision for learning generative models: An empirical study. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 150, 258–272.

Andryani, R., Negara, E. S., Syaputra, R., & Erlansyah, D. (2023). Analysis of academic social networks in Indonesia. Qubahan Academic Journal, 3, 409–421.

Rahmat, D., Danial, E., & Tanshzil, S. W. (2020). Analysis of implementation of debate learning model in constitutional law subjects as efforts to improve students’ critical thinking skills. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 418, 546–551.

Khumsikiew, J., Donsamak, S., & Saeteaw, M. (2015). A model of small-group problem-based learning in pharmacy education: Teaching in the clinical environment. IAFOR Journal of Education, 3.

Apdoludin, & Martinisyamin. (2022). Modeling analysis, findings, development, organizing the material and learning for students in Islamic boarding schools. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8, 25–36.

Apdoludin, Wiryotinoyo, M., & Hadiyanto. (2017). Analysis and discovery model for learning yellow book in pesantren. Online Journal of New Horizons in Education, 7, 1–11.

Joyce, B., & Weil, M. (2003). Fifth edition models of teaching. Prentice Hall India.

Widiana, I. W., & Jampel, I. N. (2016). Learning model and form of assessment toward the inferential statistical achievement by controlling numeric thinking skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 5, 135.

Apdoludin, Saidek, A. R., & Islami, R. (2016). Model debate for the yellow book learning in Islamic boarding school. Journal of Education and Practice, 7, 1–7.

Lau, L. C. M., Chui, E. C. S., Man, G. C. W., Xin, Y., Ho, K. K. W., Mak, K. K. K., et al. (2022). A novel image-based machine learning model with superior accuracy and predictability for knee arthroplasty loosening detection and clinical decision making. Journal of Orthopaedic Translation, 36, 177–183.

Fathi-Ashtiani, A., & Salimi, S. H. (2007). Cooperative learning model on science achievement. Unpublished manuscript, 1–5.

Staddon, R. V. (2022). A supported flipped learning model for mathematics gives safety nets for online and blended learning. Computers & Education Open, 3, 100106.

Dantas, L. A., & Cunha, A. (2020). An integrative debate on learning styles and the learning process. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2, 100017.

Yashnikova, N. (2022). Modelling developing readiness of maritime graduates for profession-oriented foreign-language communication by means of contextual learning. Transportation Research Procedia, 63, 167–177.

Velasco, E. V., Ibarra, F. P., & Mukminin, A. (2022). The readiness on the implementation of the special program for information and communication technology. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 22, 79–89.

Cole, J. D., Ruble, M. J., Povlak, A., Nettle, P., Sims, K., & Choyce, B. (2020). Self-directed, higher-level learning through journal club debates. Health Professions Education, 6, 594–604.

Al Hamoud, A., Hoenig, A., & Roy, K. (2022). Sentence subjectivity analysis of a political and ideological debate dataset using LSTM and BiLSTM with attention and GRU models. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences, 34, 7974–7987.

Apdoludin. (2023). Belajar dan pembelajaran berbasis scientific (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Deepublish.

Muñoz del Río, A., Casero-Alonso, V., & Amo-Salas, M. (2024). A new methodology to robustify an experimental design: Application to the Baranyi model. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 247, 105104.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Mixed methods procedures.

Myers, M. D. (2014). Penelitian kualitatif.

Ruzafa-Martínez, M., Molina-Rodríguez, A., Pérez-Muñoz, V., Leal-Costa, C., & Ramos-Morcillo, A. J. (2023). Effectiveness of the flipped classroom methodology on the learning of evidence-based practice of nursing students: Quasi-experimental design. Nurse Education Today, 128.

Mesra, R. (2023). Research & development dalam pendidikan. Sumatera Utara: PT. Mifandi Mandiri Digital.