Criminal Victimization and Legal Challenges of Migrants in Developed Countries: A Critical Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v6n1a2308Keywords:
criminal victimization, migration dynamics, developed countries, legal definitions and protections.Abstract
This article examines migrant victimization as a structural outcome of migration governance systems in developed countries. This study demonstrates that variations in enforcement intensity, labor-market segmentation, and procedural safeguards explain cross-regional differences in exposure to harm and access to justice, thereby reframing migrant victimization as a governance-dependent outcome rather than an individual-level vulnerability. Criminal victimization remains an under-explored facet of migration dynamics in developed countries, despite migrants’ overrepresentation as victims. Legal scholarship on this topic is exceptionally limited and primarily focused on refugee protection. The victimization of migrants at the hands of individuals, groups, and authorities is therefore examined with the aim of informing research agendas, policy debates, and international cooperation. The assessment proceeds in six steps. First, migrant victimization patterns are outlined according to crime type, drawing on the European Union, the United States, and the Global South as contextual frames. Next, legal definitions and protections are distinguished from victimization levels, with the international legal framework and the concept of safe access to justice underscored. Then, broader systemic drivers and comparative factors influencing victimization patterns are investigated, again through the lens of the European Union, North America, Western Europe, and Oceania. Fourth, considerations relevant to the study of migrant victimization are reviewed, including methodological challenges, variations in legal terminology, underlying fieldwork orientations, and the availability of prior research. This study argues that migrant victimization is best understood as a structural product of migration governance regimes, where enforcement design, legal stratification, and labor-market segmentation systematically shape exposure to harm and access to justice.
Downloads
References
Parkin, J. (2013). No. 61: The criminalisation of migration in Europe: A state-of-the-art of the academic literature and research. CEPS Centre for European Policy Studies.
Di Nicola, A. (2001). Trafficking in migrants: A European perspective. In Cross-border crime in a changing Europe (pp. 63–74).
Menjívar, C., & Abrego, L. (2012). Legal violence: Immigration law and the lives of Central American immigrants. American Journal of Sociology, 117(5), 1380–1421.
Pavlou, V. (2018). Where to look for change?: A critique of the use of modern slavery and trafficking frameworks in the fight against migrant domestic workers’ vulnerability. European Journal of Migration and Law, 20(1), 83–107.
Valles, H. K. (2017). The plight of undocumented female migrants: Identifying structural factors that contribute to the proliferation of sex trafficking and the failings of international law.
Vissandjée, B., Short, W. E., & Bates, K. (2017). Health and legal literacy for migrants: Twinned strands woven in the cloth of social justice and the human right to health care. BMC International Health and Human Rights, 17(1), 10.
Tsuchiya, K., Toles, O., Levesque, C., Horner, K., Ryu, E., Chan, L., & DeWaard, J. (2021). Perceived structural vulnerabilities among detained noncitizen immigrants in Minnesota. PLoS ONE, 16(6), e0252232.
Golash-Boza, T. (2010). Notes from the field: The criminalization of undocumented migrants: Legalities and realities. Societies Without Borders, 5(1), 81–90.
Lewis, H., & Waite, L. (2015). Asylum, immigration restrictions and exploitation: Hyper-precarity as a lens for understanding and tackling forced labour. Anti-Trafficking Review, 5, 50–68.
Vickers, T., Clayton, J., Davison, H., Hudson, L., Cañadas, M. A., Biddle, P., & Lilley, S. (2019). Dynamics of precarity among ‘new migrants’: Exploring the worker–capital relation through mobilities and mobility power. Mobilities, 14(5), 696–714.
Czymara, C. S., & Mitchell, J. (2023). All cops are trusted? How context and time shape immigrants’ trust in the police in Europe. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 46(1), 72–96.
Rodriguez Schlegel, B. (2011). Immigration, crime, and public perception: Victimization legislation in the United States and Canada—Can the U visa serve as a model? Hastings International and Comparative Law Review, 34, 203–246.
Hoang, K., & Reich, S. (2017). Managing crime through migration law in Australia and the United States: A comparative analysis. Comparative Migration Studies, 5(1), 12.
De Schrijver, L., Vander Beken, T., Krahé, B., & Keygnaert, I. (2018). Prevalence of sexual violence in migrants, applicants for international protection, and refugees in Europe: A critical interpretive synthesis of the evidence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(9), 1979.
Hadfield, K., Ungar, M., Emond, A., Foster, K., Gatt, J. M., Mason-Jones, A., … Wu, Q. (2020). Challenges of developing and conducting an international study of resilience in migrant adolescents. International Social Work, 63(2), 232–237.
Rustamova, N., Raupova, S., Aminjonova, M., Yakubova, I., Yuldashov, A., Daminov, K., & Rajabov, B. (2025). Ethical, legal, and social factors in vitagen education: Shaping media mentality and critical competencies of university students. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(4), 743–763.
Rustamovna, S. X., & Abdumalikovna, Y. M. (2025). Legal issues of digital asset inheritance from an Islamic law perspective. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam dan Kemanusiaan, 25(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qubahan Academic Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.



