Instagram Stories and Self-Expression among Nonverbal Individuals with Disabilities in Saudi Arabia: Implications for Inclusion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v6n3a2479Keywords:
Digital inclusion, Instagram stories, Multimodality, Assistive communication, Inclusive design, Accessibility, Online safety, Augmentative and alternative communication (AAC), Saudi Arabia, Social participation.Abstract
This qualitative case study examines how nonverbal individuals with disabilities in Saudi Arabia use INSTAGRAM stories to express themselves, maintain social presence, and participate in online communities. Drawing on platform affordance theory, multimodality, and critical digital inclusion perspectives, the study addresses a gap in research on how ephemeral and multimodal social media features support communication for users who encounter substantial barriers to spoken interaction. Data were collected from twelve adult participants through semi-structured interviews and a three-month review of consented Instagram Stories artifacts. The data were examined using a hybrid thematic analysis that combined deductive coding aligned with the research questions and inductive coding of emergent patterns across interview accounts and story artifacts. findings show that stories functioned as a low-pressure daily diary, a multimodal communication space, and a means of confidence-building and peer connection. participants used images, short videos, music, emojis, stickers, captions, and interactive tools not as decorative features but as communicative resources for expressing emotion, achievement, frustration, and identity. However, participation was constrained by device and connectivity inequalities, limited compatibility with AAC and assistive technologies, interface complexity, privacy concerns, and fear of ableist harassment. the study contributes to educational technology and inclusive design by showing that digital inclusion for nonverbal users depends not only on access to platforms but also on meaningful, safe, and user-controlled participation. The article concludes with user-informed recommendations for accessible Story authoring, stronger moderation, assistive-technology compatibility, and collaboration with disability organizations.
Downloads
References
Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.
Marwick, A. E., & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–133.
Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2013). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143–189.
Evans, S. K., Pearce, K. E., Vitak, J., & Treem, J. W. (2017). Explicating affordances: A conceptual framework for understanding affordances in communication research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 22(1), 35–52.
Bainotti, L., Caliandro, A., & Gandini, A. (2021). From archive cultures to ephemeral content, and back: Studying Instagram Stories with digital methods. New Media & Society, 23(12), 3656–3676.
Kreling, R., Meier, A., & Reinecke, L. (2022). Feeling authentic on social media: Subjective authenticity across Instagram Stories and posts. Social Media + Society, 8(1).
Communications, Space and Technology Commission. (2025). Saudi Internet Report 2024.
Digital Government Authority. (2024). Introductory guide: Digital Inclusion Program.
Blackstone, S. W., Williams, M. B., & Wilkins, D. P. (2007). Key principles underlying research and practice in AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23(3), 191–203.
Caron, J., & Light, J. (2016). “Social media has opened a world of open communication”: Experiences of adults with cerebral palsy who use augmentative and alternative communication and social media. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 32(1), 25–40.
Caton, S., & Chapman, M. (2016). The use of social media and people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and thematic analysis. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 41(2), 125–139.
Shpigelman, C. N., & Gill, C. J. (2014). Facebook use by persons with disabilities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 610–624.
Bowker, N., & Tuffin, K. (2002). Disability discourses for online identities. Disability & Society, 17(3), 327–344.
Cocq, C., & Ljuslinder, K. (2020). Self-representations on social media: Reproducing and challenging discourses on disability. Alter, 14(2), 71–84.
Goodley, D. (2017). Disability studies: An interdisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). Sage.
Goggin, G., & Newell, C. (2003). Digital disability: The social construction of disability in new media. Rowman & Littlefield.
Ellcessor, E. (2016). Restricted access: Media, disability, and the politics of participation. New York University Press.
Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.
Jewitt, C. (Ed.). (2016). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Light, B., Burgess, J., & Duguay, S. (2018). The walkthrough method: An approach to the study of apps. New Media & Society, 20(3), 881–900.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13.
Heung, S., Jiang, L., Azenkot, S., & Vashistha, A. (2024). “Vulnerable, victimized, and objectified”: Understanding ableist hate and harassment experienced by disabled content creators on social media. Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 744, 1–19.
Dobransky, K., & Hargittai, E. (2006). The disability divide in internet access and use. Information, Communication & Society, 9(3), 313–334.
Chadwick, D., Wesson, C., & Fullwood, C. (2013). Internet access by people with intellectual disabilities: Inequalities and opportunities. Future Internet, 5(3), 376–397.
Pereira, L. S., Coelho, J., Rodrigues, A., Guerreiro, J., Guerreiro, T., & Duarte, C. (2022). Authoring accessible media content on social networks. Proceedings of the 24th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qubahan Academic Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


