Perceived Employability Under Digital Transformation: A Multilevel Systematic Review of Antecedents and Contextual Influences

Authors

  • Febby Chika Putri Mulfag Department of Management Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Padang State University, Padang 25131, West Sumatra, Indonesia; https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8537-665X
  • Idris Department of Environmental Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Padang State University, Padang 25131, West Sumatra, Indonesia.
  • Rino Department of Management Science, Faculty of Economics and Business, Padang State University, Padang 25131, West Sumatra, Indonesia; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9303-2698

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v6n3a2494

Keywords:

Perceived employability, Digital transformation, Employability antecedents, Career self-management, Systematic literature review, Human capital.

Abstract

Digital transformation, together with the rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) and the increasing instability of the labor market, continues to have a significant influence on the way jobs are structured and has created greater uncertainty about long-term career sustainability. In this constantly changing environment, perceived employability (PE) has come to play a crucial role, as it represents how individuals perceive their capacity to secure and maintain employment, as well as the opportunities available to them in the job market. It also reflects expectations about future career prospects, including whether suitable opportunities exist in relation to their qualifications. However, a notable gap still exists in current theories explaining how PE is formed, particularly regarding how rapid technological change reshapes its core components and frame of reference. To address this gap, a systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to provide a clearer understanding of the multilevel antecedents of perceived employability in the digital era. Following the PRISMA Guidelines, 106 Scopus-indexed articles published between 2005 and 2025 were analyzed. The findings demonstrated that perceived employability is shaped by a complex and interrelated set of antecedents operating at the individual, organizational, and external levels. At the individual level, key antecedents included career attitudes, psychological resources, competencies, and learning experiences. At the organizational level, important factors involved career management practices, access to training and development, job characteristics, and workplace support systems. External antecedents included labor market dynamics, broader socioeconomic conditions, and institutional reputation. Across these levels, digital transformation functioned as a cross-cutting contextual force shaping how these antecedents interact and evolve through digital skills, digital literacy, attitudes toward technology, and technology-related stress. Overall, this review provides an integrative foundation for future research while offering practical insights for organizations, universities, and policymakers seeking to strengthen employability in an increasingly digitalized labor market.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Munn, Z., et al. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18(1), 143.

McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica, 22(3), 276–282.

Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228.

Fugate, M., Kinicki, A. J., & Ashforth, B. E. (2004). Employability: A psycho-social construct. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 65(1), 14–38.

Fontinha, R., de Cuyper, N., Williams, S., & Scott, P. (2018). The impact of HRM, perceived employability and job insecurity. Thunderbird International Business Review, 60(5), 861–871.

Likic-Brboric, B., et al. (2022). Active labor market policies and perceived employability. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 43(2), 567–589.

Apdoludin, A., Eriyani, E., Ridhoh, A., & Putri, D. I. (2025). Development of a Character-Based Debate, Analysis and Findings Learning Model Integrated with Digital Life Skill Technology in Elementary Schools in Indonesia. Qubahan Academic Journal, 5(4), 723-742.

Bennett, D., Knight, E., Koshy, P., & Li, I. (2021). Does regionality influence students’ perceived employability? Australian and International Journal of Rural Education, 31(2), 1–15.

Byrne, C. (2022). What determines perceived graduate employability? Studies in Higher Education, 47(1), 159–176.

CASP. (2018). CASP checklists. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme.

Carroll, C., Booth, A., & Cooper, K. (2013). A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 13(1), 37.

Caballero, G., Álvarez-González, P., & López-Miguens, M. J. (2022). Which are the predictors of perceived employability? Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(6), 878–895.

Mazalin, K., & Parmač Kovačić, M. (2015). Determinants of higher education students’ self-perceived employability. Društvena Istraživanja, 24(4), 509–529.

Bartunek, J. M., & Rynes, S. L. (2010). The construction and contributions of “implications for practice.” Academy of Management Learning & Education, 9(1), 100–117.

Kieser, A., & Leiner, L. (2009). Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533.

Houben, E., de Cuyper, N., Kyndt, E., & Forrier, A. (2021). Learning to be employable or being employable to learn. Journal of Career Development, 48(4), 443–458.

Berntson, E., Sverke, M., & Marklund, S. (2006). Predicting perceived employability: Human capital or labour market opportunities? Economic and Industrial Democracy, 27(2), 223–244.

Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.

Lissitsa, S., & Chachashvili-Bolotin, S. (2019). The effect of digital variables on perceived employability. Israel Affairs, 25(6), 1082–1104.

Belur, J., Tompson, L., Thornton, A., & Simon, M. (2021). Interrater reliability in systematic reviews. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(3), 259–273.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

de Vos, A., Forrier, A., van der Heijden, B., & de Cuyper, N. (2017). Keep the expert! Career Development International, 22(3), 318–332.

Forrier, A., Verbruggen, M., & De Cuyper, N. (2015). Integrating different notions of employability in a dynamic chain. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 89, 56–67.

Rothwell, A., & Arnold, J. (2007). Self-perceived employability: Development and validation of a scale. Personnel Review, 36(1), 23–41.

Domagała-Zyśk, E., Mamcarz, P., Martynowska, K., Fudali-Czyż, A., & Rothwell, A. (2022). Self-perceived employability scale – Polish adaptation. New Educational Review, 70, 9–22.

Gamboa, V., Rothwell, A., Monarca, M. A., & Gomes, J. (2022). Validation of self-perceived employability scale. Revista de Estudios e Investigación en Psicología y Educación, 9(1), 97–116.

Vanhercke, D., De Cuyper, N., Peeters, E., & De Witte, H. (2014). Defining perceived employability: A psychological approach. Personnel Review, 43(4), 592–605.

de Cuyper, N., Mauno, S., Kinnunen, U., & Mäkikangas, A. (2012). The role of job insecurity in perceived employability. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(1), 1–15.

Rothstein, H. R., Sutton, A. J., & Borenstein, M. (Eds.). (2005). Publication bias in meta-analysis. Wiley.

Hedström, P., & Ylikoski, P. (2010). Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 49–67.

Kim, K. T. (2020). Digital literacy and perceived employability among Korean college students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(6), 2520–2535.

Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Aromataris, E., & Munn, Z. (Eds.). (2020). JBI manual for evidence synthesis. JBI.

Mäkikangas, A., de Cuyper, N., Mauno, S., & Kinnunen, U. (2013). A longitudinal person-centred view on perceived employability. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 22(4), 490–503.

Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 45.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Hong, Q. N., et al. (2018). Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018. McGill University.

Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences. Blackwell.

Sterne, J. A. C., et al. (2016). ROBINS-I: A tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies. BMJ, 355, i4919.

Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2013). Social cognitive career theory. In S. D. Brown & R. W. Lent (Eds.), Career development and counseling (2nd ed., pp. 115–146). Wiley.

Baluku, M. M., Mugabi, E. N., Nansamba, J., Matagi, L., Onderi, P., & Otto, K. (2021). Psychological capital and career outcomes among final year university students. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology, 6, 55–80.

Finlay, L. (2002). “Outing” the researcher. Qualitative Health Research, 12(4), 531–545.

Brown, S. D., & Lent, R. W. (2019). Social cognitive career theory at 25: Empirical status of the interest, choice, and performance models. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 115, 103316.

Okoli, C. (2015). A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 37, 43.

Ergün, M., & Şeşen, H. (2021). A comprehensive study on university students’ perceived employability. SAGE Open, 11(3).

Lim, W. M., Kumar, S., & Ali, F. (2022). What is a good review article? Australasian Marketing Journal, 30(4), 291–304.

Onyishi, I. E., et al. (2022). Core self-evaluations, perceived employability, and job search. Career Development International, 27(1), 88–106.

Chiesa, R., Fazi, L., Guglielmi, D., & Mariani, M. G. (2018). Enhancing sustainability: Psychological capital, perceived employability, and job insecurity. Sustainability, 10(7), 2475.

Rodrigues, R., et al. (2021). Career orientations and perceived employability. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 126, 103544.

Tee, K. P., Cham, T. H., Low, M. P., & Lau, T. C. (2022). Protean career orientation and perceived employability. Journal of Career Development, 49(4), 845–860.

Drange, I., Bernstrøm, V. H., & Mamelund, S. E. (2018). Skills-based variation in self-perceived employability. Work, Employment and Society, 32(2), 387–406.

Rivera, H., Waxman, H. C., & Powers, R. (2012). English Language Learners' educational resilience and classroom learning environment. Educational Research Quarterly, 35(4), 57–78.

Alvarez, M. (2017). Una herramienta para apoyar la toma de decisiones informada: los modelos de simulación para el diseño y control de políticas educativas. Revista Latinoamericana de Políticas y Administración de la Educación, (6), 101–110.

Soares, M. E., & Mosquera, P. (2021). Linking career management practices with individual outcomes. Journal of Business Research, 124, 547–559.

Park, Y. (2020). Leader–member exchange and perceived employability. International Journal of Training and Development, 24(2), 105–117.

Pinto, L. H., & Ramalheira, D. C. (2021). Business graduates’ employability in the post-pandemic era. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 128, 103589.

Ricci, A., Crivellaro, F., & Bolzani, D. (2021). Perceived employability of highly skilled migrant women in STEM. Administrative Sciences, 11(1), 7.

Published

2026-07-14

How to Cite

Chika Putri Mulfag , F., Idris , I., & Rino , R. (2026). Perceived Employability Under Digital Transformation: A Multilevel Systematic Review of Antecedents and Contextual Influences. Qubahan Academic Journal, 6(3), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v6n3a2494

Issue

Section

Articles