Oil Price Shocks, Fiscal Asymmetry, and Digital Governance in MENA Economies: A Panel VAR Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v6n4a2603Keywords:
Panel VAR, Oil price Shocks, MENA fiscal policy, Fiscal asymmetry, Digital Governance, Budget rigidity.Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to examine the relationship between oil-price shocks, fiscal dynamics, and digital-governance readiness in twelve MENA economies over 2013–2024 using a first-difference Panel Vector Autoregressive (PVAR) model. The first-difference specification is adopted following the absence of evidence for a long-run cointegrating relationship among the integrated fiscal and digital-governance variables. Three main findings emerge. First, oil-price shocks constitute a major external driver of fiscal dynamics, accounting for approximately 29–30% of the forecast error variance of the fiscal balance across the horizons considered and approximately 25–31% of public-debt variance. Second, the transmission is strongly asymmetric across country groups. Among oil exporters, a 1% increase in Brent prices is associated with a 0.165-percentage-point increase in the fiscal balance (p < 0.001), whereas the corresponding coefficient for oil importers is statistically indistinguishable from zero (+0.001, p = 0.915). This contrast is consistent with the different fiscal transmission mechanisms associated with hydrocarbon revenues, energy-import costs, subsidies, inflation, and domestic economic activity. Third, digital-governance readiness, measured through an annual proxy based on the first principal component of internet penetration and WGI political stability, does not exhibit statistically significant Granger-predictive causality with fiscal outcomes at the annual frequency. The Granger-causality tests yield an F-statistic of 0.034 (p = 0.853) for digital governance predicting changes in the fiscal balance and 0.287 (p = 0.593) for the reverse direction. These results provide no evidence of a short-run predictive relationship between digital-governance readiness and fiscal-balance changes at the annual frequency. Finally, we construct a Budget Resilience and AI Index (BRAI) as a descriptive cross-sectional scorecard of the twelve MENA economies, combining fiscal resilience and digital readiness. Overall, the findings highlight the importance of oil-price exposure and country-specific fiscal structures in explaining short-run fiscal dynamics, while suggesting that the aggregate fiscal effects of digital-governance readiness may not be detectable at an annual frequency.
Downloads
References
International Monetary Fund. (2015). Regional economic outlook: Middle East and Central Asia: Learning to live with cheaper oil amid weaker demand, January 2015 update. International Monetary Fund.
International Monetary Fund. (2015). Regional economic outlook: Middle East and Central Asia, October 2015: Fiscal adjustment to lower oil prices in MENA and CCA oil exporters. International Monetary Fund.
Westerlund, J. (2007). Testing for error correction in panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(6), 709–748.
Sadraoui, T., & Mili, H. (2025). Dynamic interactions between oil price volatility and fiscal policy: Empirical evidence from GCC countries. Economies, 13(11), 334.
Fountain, J. E. (2001). Building the virtual state: Information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press.
Talvi, E., & Végh, C. A. (2005). Tax base variability and procyclical fiscal policy in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 78(1), 156–190.
Kaminsky, G., Reinhart, C., & Végh, C. (2004). When it rains, it pours: Procyclical capital flows and macroeconomic policies. NBER Working Paper No. 10780. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Tornell, A., & Lane, P. R. (1999). The voracity effect. American Economic Review, 89(1), 22–46.
Marioli, F. A., & Végh, C. (2023). Fiscal procyclicality in commodity exporting countries: How much does it pour and why? NBER Working Paper No. 31431. National Bureau of Economic Research.
Çiçekçi, C., & Gayğısız, E. (2023). Procyclicality of fiscal policy in oil-rich countries: Roles of resource funds and institutional quality. Resources Policy, 85, 103675.
AlMarzoqi, R., Ben Tahar, M., & Ben Slimane, S. (2026). Rethinking fiscal policy in oil-dependent countries: Asymmetric fiscal cyclicality and its macroeconomic implications in Saudi Arabia. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper.
Marioli, F. A., & Vasishtha, G. (2025). Fiscal policy procyclicality and volatility in commodity-exporting emerging and developing economies: Determinants and implications for growth. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 11037. World Bank.
Lulaj, E. (2024). Thriving amidst uncertainty: A financial blueprint for the public budget. Public Sector Economics, 48(4), 493–528.
OECD. (2025). Governing with artificial intelligence: The state of play and way forward in core government functions. OECD Publishing.
Nomran, N. M., Shaikh, Z. H., Anto, M. L., & Al-Jabali, N. E. M. (2025). The impact of electronic government development on tax payments performance: Evidence from GCC countries. In R. K. Hamdan (Ed.), Sustainable data management (Studies in Big Data, Vol. 170, pp. 633–641). Springer.
Rezaei, E., & Jablonsky, J. (2025). Government digitalization and tax collection efficiency in emerging economies. In A. Mirzazadeh et al. (Eds.), Science, engineering management and information technology (Communications in Computer and Information Science, Vol. 2651). Springer.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.
Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 22(2), 265–312.
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross-sectional dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper No. 1229 / IZA Discussion Paper No. 1240.
Westerlund, J., & Edgerton, D. L. (2007). A simple test for cointegration in dependent panels with structural breaks. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(5), 665–704.
Pedroni, P. (2004). Panel cointegration: Asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric Theory, 20(3), 597–625.
Persyn, D., & Westerlund, J. (2008). Error-correction-based cointegration tests for panel data. The Stata Journal, 8(2), 232–241.
Baumeister, C., & Hamilton, J. D. (2019). Structural interpretation of vector autoregressions with incomplete identification: Revisiting the role of oil supply and demand shocks. American Economic Review, 109(5), 1873–1910.
Pesaran, M. H., & Smith, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 79–113.
International Monetary Fund. (2025). World economic outlook: Global economy in flux, prospects remain dim. International Monetary Fund.
Munoz, E., & Olaberria, E. (2019). Are budget rigidities a source of fiscal distress and a constraint for fiscal consolidation? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 8957. World Bank.
Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review, 95(1), 161–182.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Qubahan Academic Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.


