Cross-Cultural Gender-Based Investigation of Filipino and Chinese Facebook Users’ Disagreement Strategies

Joan C. Ravago; John  Arvin V. De Roxas; Joel M. Torres; Daisy O. Casipit; Mercedita M. Reyes

doi:10.48161/qaj.v4n2a538

Authors

Joan C. Ravago Department of English and Humanities, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Central Luzon State University, Science City of Muñoz Nueva Ecija 3120, Philippines;
John Arvin V. De Roxas Department of English and Humanities, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Central Luzon State University, Science City of Muñoz Nueva Ecija 3120, Philippines;
Joel M. Torres Department of Language, Culture and Arts Education, College of Education, Central Luzon State University, Science City of Muñoz Nueva Ecija 3120, Philippines;
Daisy O. Casipit Department of English and Humanities, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Central Luzon State University, Science City of Muñoz Nueva Ecija 3120, Philippines;
Mercedita M. Reyes Department of English and Humanities, College of Arts and Social Sciences, Central Luzon State University, Science City of Muñoz Nueva Ecija 3120, Philippines;

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n2a538

Abstract

Objectives: This study analyzed how Filipino and Chinese individuals express disagreements on Facebook, focusing on gender dynamics. It further investigated the differences in the disagreement strategies and lexical features of male and female participants in their online disagreement discourses. Methods: A descriptive-qualitative design was used. The corpus consisting 50 discourses derived from the participants’ Facebook posts were analyzed using Leech’s (2016) Taxonomies of Directness and Levinson's (2017) Categories of Indirectness. Further, a bilingual Chinese participant, who is also a professional translator, translated the discourses. Results: Findings revealed that Filipino and Chinese participants employed different strategies, such as implicit performative strategies through non-elliptical expression and counterstatement with justification, declaration, and sarcasm, and indirect disagreement strategies through interrogative, declarative, and imperative statements. Interestingly, differences in disagreement strategies arise between genders. Filipino male participants are corrective and direct in expressing disagreement compared to Chinese male participants who employed justification and indirect strategy through statements. Concerning the female participants, Filipino participants used a direct strategy with negation, followed by downtoners and an indirect strategy through sarcastic questions. Meanwhile, Chinese participants used statements followed by clarification and compliments to express indirect disagreement. Finally, diverse linguistic elements indicated disagreement, as Filipinos utilized modal verbs, whereas Chinese participants employed discourse markers and softening language. Conclusion: The findings suggest that disagreement strategies are gender-based. Despite the participants shared cultural backgrounds, Chinese communicators demonstrate proclivity for indirectness, with more extensive linguistic features to save face and downtone their disagreements. The study offers research gaps on disagreement strategies across gender and for future research to cover larger samples and methods to warrant the generalizability of the key findings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Herring, S. C. (2004). Computer-Mediated Discourse Analysis: An Approach to Researching Online Behavior. In S. A. Barab, R. Kling, & J. H. Gray (Eds.), Designing for virtual communities in the service of learning (pp. 338–376).

Thorne, S. (2008). Thorne, S. L. (2008). Computer-Mediated Communication. In N. Hornberger & N. Van Duesen-Scholl (eds.). Encyclopedia of Language and Education, 2(4), 325–336.

Yang, Y., Aalst, J., and Chan, C. (2021). Examining online discourse using the knowledge connection analyzer framework and collaborative tools in knowledge building, Sustainability (MDPI) 13(14), 1-18.

Herring, S. & Androutsopoulos, J. (2015). Computer-Mediated Discourse 2.0. Wiley Online Library

Ravago, J., Reyes, M., Casipit, D. Martinez, P.A. (2023). Facebooking in the classroom: Using Fb vocabulary and discourse structure in L2 teaching in the Philippines. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 22 (9), 310-331.

Dixon (2024). Leading countries based on Facebook audience size as of January 2024. Statistica.com.

Ting-Toomey, S. (1999). Communicating across Cultures. The Guilford Press, New York

Abrams, K. (2020, February 2). Family, Gender, and Leadership in the Legal Profession. Ssrn.com.

Koczogh, H. (2012). Gender role in verbal disagreement: A study of disagreement strategies employed by Hungarian undergraduate students. Gender Studies, 11(1), 233-244.

Fitzgerald, R. & Housley, W. (2002). Identity, categorization, and sequential organization: The sequential and categorical flow of identity in a radio phone-in. Discourse and Society, 13(5), 579-602.

Morand, D. & Ocker, R. (2003). Politeness Theory and Computer-Mediated Communication: A Sociolinguistic Approach to Analyzing Relational Messages. Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA.

Misra, A., & Walker, M.A. (2013). Topic Independent Identification of Agreement and Disagreement in Social Media Dialogue. SIGDIAL Conference.

Siafanau, M. (2012). Disagreement, face, and politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(12), 1554–1564

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (Vol. 4). Cambridge University Press.

Pomerantz, A., & Heritage, J. (2012). Preference. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing. 210-228.

Yang, Y. (2021). Disagreement strategies on Chinese forums: comparing data from Hong Kong and Mainland China. SAGE Open, 11(3).

Edelsky, C. (1981). Who's got the floor, Language in Society, 10(3),383–42.

Coates, J. (1986). Women, Men and Language. New York: Longman Inc.

Tannen, D. (1990). Gender differences in topical coherence: Creating involvement in best friends' talk. Discourse Processes, 13(1), 73–90.

Pilkington, A. (1998). Manufacturing strategy regained: evidence for the demise of best-practice. California Management Review, 41(1), 31-42.

Ngabonziza, A.J. (2013). The importance of language studies in conflict resolution. Journal of African Conflicts and Peace Studies, 2(1), 33-37.

Parvaresh, V. & Rasekh, A. (2009). Speech act disagreement among young women in Iran. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, 11(4), 1481-4374.

Pham, N.Q., Tran, L. M., Do, C.T., Dao, H. Nguyen, P. (2022). EFL agreeing and disagreeing discourses in Facebook. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, Volume 86.

Scott, S. (2002). Linguistic feature variation within disagreements: An empirical investigation. Text & Talk, 22(2), 301-328.

Shabaka, S. (2013). The Liguistic Realization of EFL Egyptian Speakers [Thesis for MA in English Linguistics]. New Applications and International Communication.

Leech, G. (2014). Language in literature: Style and foregrounding. London: Routledge

Leech, G. (2016). Principles of pragmatics. London: Routledge

Levinson, S. C. (2017). Speech acts. In Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. 199-216.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Chen, G.-M. (2011). An introduction to key concepts in understanding the Chinese: Harmony as the foundation of Chinese communication. China Media Research, 7(4),1–1.

Kaplan, R. B. (1967). Contrastive rhetoric and the teaching of composition. TESOL quarterly, 1(4), 10-16.

Kaplan, R. (2005). Contrastive rhetoric. In Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 375–391).

Lakoff, R. (1973). Language and Woman's Place, Source: Language in Society, 2, 1.

Kraft, D. (2019). Contrastive Analysis and Contrastive Rhetoric in the Legal Writing Classroom, 49.

Triandis, H. C., & Singelis, T. M. (1998). Training to recognize individual differences in collectivism and individualism within culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 22(1), 35-47.

Shen, L. (2006). A discourse analysis of Chinese disagreement management strategies in business negotiation settings. The University of Arizona.

Tsai, P. J. (2009). A discourse analysis of English and Taiwan's national development [Doctoral dissertation]. Teachers College, Columbia University).

Tuan, J. H., & Hsu, H. J. (2009). An analysis of indirectness in disagreement: a corpus study on intercultural conversations between Taiwanese and Native Speakers of English. 人文社會電子學報, 5(2), 13-31.

Lynch, M. (2019). Garfinkel, Sacks and formal structures: Collaborative origins, divergences and the history of ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Human Studies, 42, 183–198.

Peña, I. et.al., (2006). Pakikisama: In the spirit of camaraderie. University of California Consortium for Language Learning & Teaching (UCCLLT).

Rees-Miller, J. (2000). Power, severity, and context in disagreement. Journal of Pragmatics, 32(8), 1087-1111.

Hibatullah, A. (2019). Verbal disagreement strategies applied by female main character in “To all the boys I’ve loved before” [Undergraduate thesis]. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, 50-54.

Heidary, A. et.al., (2015). Politeness strategies and power relations in disagreement. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, 4(2), 33-41.

Bavarsad, S. S., Eslami-Rasekh, A., & Simin, S. (2015). The study of disagreement strategies to suggestions used by Iranian male and female learners. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 49, 30-42.

Suroiya, H.M. (2017). Various verbal disagreeing strategies applied by male and female villain in detective conan movie series [Undergraduate thesis]. UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Sofwan, A., & Siwignyo, E. (2011). The realization of disagreement strategies by non-native speakers of English. Language Circle; Journal of Language and Literature, 6(1), 41-56

Farahani, A.A.K. & Molkizadeh, A.P. (2013). An investigation of Iranian advanced EFL learners’ application of politeness strategies in disagreement between two genders. International Research Journal of Applied and Basic Sciences, 5(5), 628-633.

Alzahrani, M. (2023). The impact of power distance and gender on the choice of disagreement strategies in Saudi Colloquial Arabic, International Linguistics Research, 6(2), 8-22.

Boonkongsaen, N. (2013). Filipinos and Thais saying “no” in English. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, 16(1), 23 -40.

Kaplan, R.B. (2006). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20

Lynch, F. (1962). Philippine values II: Social acceptance. Philippine Studies, 10(1), 82–99

de Zulueta, P. (2008). Welcome to the ethics section of the London Journal of Primary Care. London Journal of Primary Care, 1(1), 5-7

Soriano, C. R. R., & Gaw, M. F. (2022). Broadcasting anti‐media populism in the Philippines: YouTube influencers, networked political brokerage, and implications for governance. Policy & Internet, 14(3), 508-524.

Licuanan, P. B. (1994). A moral recovery program: Building a people—building a nation. Values in the Philippine culture and education, 35-54.

Andres, T. Q. D. (1981). Understanding Filipino Values. Quezon City, Phils.: New Day Publishers.

Andres, T. Q. D. (2001). Filipino Behavior at Work. Quezon City, Phils.: Giraffe Books.

Soriano, M. R. (2018). Revisiting the place of Values in Philippine Society: A preliminary assessment. CLSU edu.

Almutairi, S. (2021). Disagreement strategies and (im) politeness in Saudis’ twitter communication. Journal of Languages, Texts, and Society, 5, 1-40.

Lampad, C. M. B. (2017). Facebook Chat between Filipinos and other Nationalities: Pragmatic Principles and Cross-Cultural Variations in Language. DLSU.

Saito, I. (2010). PAKIKISAMA: A Filipino Trait.

Johnson, A. (2020). The importance of disagreements. Minnesota State University, Mankato

Graham, S. (2009). Hospitalk: Politeness and hierarchical structures in interdisciplinary discharge rounds. Journal of Politeness Research, 5 (1), 11-31.

Coates, J. (2013). Women, men and Language: a sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language 3rd Edition. Routledge, New York.

Coates, J. (2014). Language, gender, and career. In Language and gender, 13–30.

Mao, Y. & Zhao, X. (2020). A discursive approach to disagreements expressed by Chinese spokespersons during press conferences, Discourse, Context & Media, 37.

Huang, L.-S. (2010). The potential influence of L1 (Chinese) on L2 (English) communication. ELT Journal, 64, 155–164.

Gu Xiao-le. (2015). A Contrastive Analysis of Chinese and American Views about Silence and Debate.

Al-ghamdi, N.A., Almansoob, N.T., & Alrefaee, Y. (2019). Pragmatic failure in the realization of the speech act of responding to compliments among Yemeni EFL undergraduates. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 25(4), 1-14.

Torres, J.M., Balasa, K.A., Ricohermoso, C., & Alieto, E.O. (2020a). Complimenting strategies in sociolinguistic settings: The case of Ilocano and Tagalog pre-service teachers. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(5.1), 202-253.

Torres, J.M., Pariña, J.M., Collantes, L.M., Tan, Richard, K. (2020b). Humor styles and perceptions of college students in Central Luzon. The Asian ESP Journal, 16(2.1), 196-209.

Torres, J.M. (2020). Politeness strategies vis-à-vis genders and exposures to western culture: The case of the ‘The Voice of the Philippines’ coaches. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 1(3), 100-117.

Torres, J.M., & Medriano, R. (2020). Rhetorical organization of Ilocano and Tagalog pre-service teachers in their argumentative essays. The Asian EFL Journal, 27(2.2.), 261-286.

Kachru, B. B. (1997). World Englishes and English-Using Communities. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17, 66–87.

Igaab, Z.K. & Wehaial, M.J. (2023). A Multi-Pragmatic Study of Sarcasm in Political Texts. World Journal of English Language, 13(6), 349-361.

Cedar, P. & Setiadi, A. (2016). Performance of Indonesian EFL learners and Thai EFL learners in compliment responses in English. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5(7), 63-76.

Wu, X. (2006). A study of strategy use in showing agreement and disagreement to others opinions. CELEA Journal, 29 (5).