E-Assessment for Character Evaluation in Elementary Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a595Abstract
This study investigates Elementary School teachers’ responses to e-assessment tools for evaluating students' character traits of patriotism, tolerance, and discipline, and compares these traits across three schools. Utilizing a research and development methodology with quantitative data, the sample includes 55 students from Elementary School 034/I Teratai, 58 from Elementary School 045I Sridadi, and 61 from Elementary School 064/I Muara Bulian, selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a questionnaire and analyzed with descriptive statistics and one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey HSD post-hoc tests. Findings reveal that Elementary School 034/I Teratai students scored highest in patriotism (89.11), Elementary School 045I Sridadi students in tolerance (88.41), and Elementary School 064/I Muara Bulian students in discipline (89.20). Significant differences in patriotism and discipline were observed between Elementary School 034/I Teratai and Elementary School 064/I Muara Bulian, and in tolerance between Elementary School 045I Sridadi and Elementary School 064/I Muara Bulian. The e-assessment tool developed was deemed highly valid and feasible for use. The impact of this e-assessment to make it easier for teachers to assess the character of high school students.
Downloads
References
Lusigi, A. (2019). Higher education, technology, and equity in Africa. New Review of Information Networking, 24(1), 1–16.
Fauziyah, A. N., Ramadan, M., Gumede, P. R., & Udosen, I. N. (2023). Development of digital book bilingual physics learning media using Kvisoft Flipbook for high school class X semester 1 subject of Newton’s law. Journal of Educational Technology and Learning Creativity, 1(1), 7–15.
Farozin, M. (2019). Counselor professional identity of counselor profession education. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidik, 38(1), 104–119.
Azahara, D. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep siswa kelas IV sekolah dasar dalam pemecahan soal-soal geometri. Jurnal Basic Education Research, 1(1), 29–35.
Popovic, N., Popovic, T., Rovcanin Dragovic, I., & Cmiljanic, O. (2018). A Moodle-based blended learning solution for physiology education in Montenegro: A case study. Advances in Physiology Education, 42(1), 111–117.
Biarty, H. (2021). Pengembangan multimedia Powerpoint pada materi benda dan sifatnya kelas V SD Negeri 64/I Muara Bulian. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 7–11.
Hardyanti, V. S., Lateef, H., & Abbas, S. A. (2023). The influence of teacher teaching creativity on student learning outcomes in mathematics subjects. Interval Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(2), 56–60.
Francis, B. S., Latib, A. A., Amiron, E., Subari, K., & Kamin, Y. (2020). Measuring the importance of non-technical skills for integration into metalwork technology curriculum using structural equation modelling. International Journal of Instruction, 13(3), 317–328.
Angraini, D. (2021). Kegiatan ekstrakurikuler pramuka dalam menerapkan karakter tanggung jawab di sekolah dasar. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 1–6.
Fakhroni, A. A., & Puotier, Z. (2023). Efforts to improve mathematics learning outcomes using Napier Bone teaching aids for elementary school students. Interval Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(2), 36–46.
Zinn, S., Landrock, U., & Gnambs, T. (2021). Web-based and mixed-mode cognitive large-scale assessments in higher education: An evaluation of selection bias, measurement bias, and prediction bias. Behavior Research Methods, 53(3), 1202–1217.
Indrianto. (2023). Performance testing on web information system using Apache JMeter and Blazemeter. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terap, 7(2), 138–149.
Farr, M. M. (2017). Silk Road: A reference. Creating public architectural intervention in the context of education & technology. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S4019–S4037.
Yoon, B., Park, I., Yun, D., & Park, G. (2019). Exploring promising vacant technology areas in a technology-oriented company based on bibliometric analysis and visualisation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 31(4), 388–405.
Teo, T. (2019). Students and teachers’ intention to use technology: Assessing their measurement equivalence and structural invariance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 201–225.
Witri, A., & Fitriani, R. S. (2020). Description of students' disciplinary attitudes in science subjects at SMPN 19 Jambi City. Integrated Science Education Journal, 1(3), 89–93.
Madsen, S. S. (2020). What is the motivation of Norwegian and New Zealand teacher educators for using digital technology when teaching?. Nordic Journal of Comparative and International Education, 4(2), 42–63.
Tsivitanidou, O. E., Georgiou, Y., & Ioannou, A. (2021). A learning experience in inquiry-based physics with immersive virtual reality: Student perceptions and an interaction effect between conceptual gains and attitudinal profiles. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 30(6), 841–861.
Wekerle, C., Daumiller, M., & Kollar, I. (2022). Using digital technology to promote higher education learning: The importance of different learning activities and their relations to learning outcomes. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(1), 1–17.
Fitchett, P. G., & Heafner, T. L. (2018). Teacher quality or quality teaching? Eighth grade social studies teachers’ professional characteristics and classroom instruction as predictors of U.S. history achievement. RMLE Online, 41(9), 1–17.
Kesorn, N., Junpeng, P., Marwiang, M., Pongboriboon, K., Tang, K. N., & Wilson, M. (2020). Development of an assessment tool for mathematical reading, analytical thinking and mathematical writing. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 955.
Tor, N., & Gordon, G. (2020). Digital interactive quantitative curiosity assessment tool: Questions worlds. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 10(8), 614–621.
Santos, A. I., & Serpa, S. (2017). The importance of promoting digital literacy in higher education. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 5(6), 90.
Ependi, R., & Pratiwi, N. I. S. (2020). Analysis of differences in science learning outcomes of class VII students of SMP Negeri 1 Muaro Jambi. Integrated Science Education Journal, 1(3), 82–88.
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based assessment: A literature review of publications in major referred journals from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 125, 101–119.
Reyna, J., & Meier, P. (2018). Learner-generated digital media (LGDM) as an assessment tool in tertiary science education: A review of literature. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6(3), 93–109.
Swidan, A., Hermans, F., & Smit, M. (2018). Programming misconceptions for school students. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 151–159). ACM.
Ogange, B. O., Agak, J. O., Okelo, K. O., & Kiprotich, P. (2018). Student perceptions of the effectiveness of formative assessment in an online learning environment. Open Praxis, 10(1), 29.
Haryanto, H., Asrial, A., Sanova, A., Widowati, A., & Saputra, A. (2024). Generic science skills: Phet applications based on discovery learning. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terap, 8(1), 158–169.
Appiah, M., & Tonder, F. (2018). E-assessment in higher education: A review. 9, 1454–1460.
Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, W., Anwar, K., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2019). Effectiveness of using e-module and e-assessment. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(09), 21.
Korkmaz, G., & Toraman, Ç. (2020). Are we ready for the Post-COVID-19 educational practice? An investigation into what educators think as to online learning. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 293–309.
Tawafak, R. M., Romli, A. B., Arshah, R. bin A., & Almaroof, R. A. S. (2018). Assessing the impact of technology learning and assessment method on academic performance: Review paper. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6).
Fathali, S., & Okada, T. (2018). Technology acceptance model in technology-enhanced OCLL contexts: A self-determination theory approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(4).
Essel, H., Nortey, S., & Butakor, P. (2019). Summative e-examination for high stake assessment in higher education: A case of undergraduate students at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Ghana. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1), 611–626.
Iqbal, M., Farida, L. N., & Win, K. T. (2023). The influence of student attitudes on learning achievement. J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, 7(2), 92–98.
Yule, S., Gupta, A., Blair, P. G., Sachdeva, A. K., & Smink, D. S. (2021). Gathering validity evidence to adapt the Non-technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) assessment tool to the United States context. J. Surg. Educ., 78(3), 955–966.
Henriksen, H. J., Roberts, M. J., van der Keur, P., Harjanne, A., Egilson, D., & Alfonso, L. (2018). Participatory early warning and monitoring systems: A Nordic framework for web-based flood risk management. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct., 31, 1295–1306.
Ewit, E. (2021). The influence of variative learning methods in Islamic religious education subjects on student learning outcomes. J. Pendidik. Agama Islam Indones., 2(4), 65–68.
Sunhaji, S. (2021). Implementation of cooperative learning strategy in forming students' thinking skills. J. Pendidik. Agama Islam Indones., 2(4), 61–64.
Giske, T., et al. (2023). Developing and testing the EPICC spiritual care competency self-assessment tool for student nurses and midwives. J. Clin. Nurs., 32(7–8), 1148–1162.
von Kotzebue, L., et al. (2021). The framework dikolan (Digital competencies for teaching in science education) as basis for the self-assessment tool dikolan-grid. Educ. Sci., 11(12), 775.
Akimov, A., & Malin, M. (2020). When old becomes new: A case study of oral examination as an online assessment tool. Assess. Eval. High. Educ., 45(8), 1205–1221.
Oktaviani, N. R. (2020). The impact of full day school implementation in learning implementation in elementary schools. J. Basic Educ. Res., 1(1), 07–15.
Jarrett, J. B., Goliak, K. L., Haines, S. T., Trolli, E., & Schwartz, A. (2022). Development of an entrustment-supervision assessment tool for pharmacy experiential education using stakeholder focus groups. Am. J. Pharm. Educ., 86(1), 15–20.
Rubiyati, F., & Effendi, Z. (2021). Development of student worksheets (LKS) using a scientific approach with the Team Assisted Individualization (TAI) method on matrix material in class X of SMA Negeri 4 Batanghari. J. Eval. Educ., 2(3), 82–89.
Sachan, A., Bhadri, G. N., & Kittur, J. (2019). Design and development of concept assessment tool (Cat): A concept inventory. J. Eng. Educ. Transform., 33(1), 16–21.
Sarwandi, B., Wibawa, R., & Wibawa, R. (2022). Usage of e-portfolio as an assessment tool in physics learning. J. Phys. Conf. Ser., 2165(1), 3–8.
Sihombing, G. G. (2022). Novick model-based learning module development: Mathematical problem solving ability. J. Eval. Educ., 3(1), 1–7.
da Silva Finamore, P., et al. (2021). Nigerian politicians, discipline, integrity, character and the rule of law: Application versus financial spending in 2019 federal elections. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 53(February), 2021.
Akhmedova, M. T. (2022). Comparative study of post-marriage nationality of women in legal systems of different countries pedagogical and psychological ways to overcome the problem of lesson discipline in secondary schools. Int. J. Multicult. Multireligious Underst., 9(No), 421–425.
Tabroni, I., Nasihah, F., & Bahijah, I. (2021). The implementation of school culture-based character education in Salem State Elementary School, Pondok Salam Subdistrict, Indonesia. Erud. J. Educ. Innov., 8(2), 202–208.
Abdullah, I., Hudayana, B., Kutanegara, P. M., & Indiyanto, A. (2019). Beyond school reach: Character education in three schools in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. J. Educ. Soc. Res., 9(3), 145–159.
Jeynes, W. H. (2019). A meta-analysis on the relationship between character education and student achievement and behavioral outcomes. Educ. Urban Soc., 51(1), 33–71.
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Think. Ski. Creat., 44(January).
Ali, S. B. A., Azlis-sani, J., Nur-annuar, M., & Mazlan, M. N. (2019). Application of newly-modified ergonomic assessment tool (NEAT) in special education classroom. J. Safety, Heal. Ergon., 1(2), 1–5.
Majuddin, C., Md. Khambari, M. N., Wong, S. L., Ghazali, N., & Mohd. Norowi, N. (2022). Students’ perspectives on the use of differentiated assessment tool: Results from an explanatory sequential mixed-method pilot study. Contemp. Educ. Technol., 14(2), ep358.
Rosyida, D. A., & Della Saputri, Z. (2022). Cultivating character education for prospective elementary school teachers through elementary social studies courses. ROMEO Rev. Multidiscip. Educ. Cult. Pedagog., 1(3), 103–112.
Alshehri, A., Rutter, M., & Smith, S. (2019). Assessing the relative importance of an e-learning system’s usability design characteristics based on students’ preferences. Eur. J. Educ. Res., 8(3), 839–855.
Taslidere, E. (2016). Development and use of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess high school students’ misconceptions about the photoelectric effect. Res. Sci. Technol. Educ., 34(2), 164–186.
Zaman, T. U., Goswami, H. D., & Hassan, Y. (2018). The impact of growth and development of slums on the health status and health awareness of slum dwellers. Int. J. Med. Res. Heal. Sci., 7(3), 55–65.
Chang, C.-C., Kuo, C.-G., & Chang, Y.-H. (2018). An assessment tool predicts learning effectiveness for project-based learning in enhancing education of sustainability. Sustainability, 10(10), 3595.
Motlhabane, A. (2016). Learner’s alternative and misconceptions in physics: A phenomenographic study. J. Balt. Sci. Educ., 15(4), 424–440.
Perdana, F. A., Zakariah, S. H., Alasmari, T., & Pasca, R. (2023). Development of learning media in the form of electronic books with dynamic electricity teaching materials. Vol. 1(1), 1–6.
Kennedy-Martin, T., et al. (2020). Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. Eur. J. Heal. Econ., 21(8), 1245–1257.
O’Rourke, B., Oortwijn, W., & Schuller, T. (2020). The new definition of health technology assessment: A milestone in international collaboration. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care, 36(3), 187–190.
See, B. H., Gorard, S., Lu, B., Dong, L., & Siddiqui, N. (2022). Is technology always helpful?: A critical review of the impact on learning outcomes of education technology in supporting formative assessment in schools. Res. Pap. Educ., 37(6), 1064–1096.
Hermino, A., & Arifin, I. (2020). Contextual character education for students in the senior high school. Eur. J. Educ. Res., 9(3), 1009–1023.
Zakso, A., Agung, I., Sofyatiningrum, E., & Calvin Capnary, M. (2022). Factors affecting character education in the development of the profile of Pancasila students: The case of Indonesia. J. Posit. Sch. Psychol., 6(2), 2254–2273.
Asrial, et al. (2024). Science teacher’s book: Analyzing elementary school students’ character values. J. Ilm. Ilmu Terap. Univ. Jambi, 8(1), 180–187.
Alimron, A., Syarnubi, S., & Maryamah, M. (2023). Character education model in Islamic higher education. AL-ISHLAH J. Pendidik., 15(3), 3334–3345.
Woo, W. H. (2018). Applying ADDIE model to ideate precision medicine in a polytechnic biomedical science programme. J. Biomed. Educ., 2018, 1–5.
Trust, T., & Pektas, E. (2018). Using the ADDIE model and universal design for learning principles to develop an open online course for teacher professional development. J. Digit. Learn. Teach. Educ., 34(4), 219–233.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Sahal, R., Breslin, J. G., & Ali, M. I. (2020). Big data and stream processing platforms for Industry 4.0 requirements mapping for a predictive maintenance use case. J. Manuf. Syst., 54, 138–151.
Baek, H., Cho, M., Kim, S., Hwang, H., Song, M., & Yoo, S. (2018). Analysis of length of hospital stay using electronic health records: A statistical and data mining approach. PLoS One, 13(4), e0195901.
Signoroni, A., Savardi, M., Baronio, A., & Benini, S. (2019). Deep learning meets hyperspectral image analysis: A multidisciplinary review. J. Imaging, 5(5), 52.
Saura, J. R. (2021). Using data sciences in digital marketing: Framework, methods, and performance metrics. J. Innov. Knowl., 6(2), 92–102.
Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2020). Educational data mining and learning analytics: An updated survey. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discov., 10(3).
Mehta, N., & Pandit, A. (2018). Concurrence of big data analytics and healthcare: A systematic review. Int. J. Med. Inform., 114, 57–65.
Shah, D., Isah, H., & Zulkernine, F. (2019). Stock market analysis: A review and taxonomy of prediction techniques. Int. J. Financ. Stud., 7(2), 26.
Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. J. Bus. Res., 133, 285–296.
Setiawan, D. (2019). The development of authentic assessment instrument to expand the character values of citizenship education at primary school No 104202 and No 106811 Bandar Setia, Medan, Indonesia. Budapest Int. Res. Critics Linguist. Educ. J., 2(1), 79–90.
Komalasari, K., & Saripudin, D. (2020). Living values-based authentic assessment in civic education in fostering student character. New Educ. Rev., 61(3), 168–180.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Qubahan Academic Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
