Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Using STEAM Projects in Teaching Physics: Student Interest in the Field of Solar Energy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n3a911Abstract
Scientific works of recent years show that students' interest in physics is comparatively declining. Given the importance of physics in the development of science and technology, it is obvious that the reduction in the number of specialists in this field causes concern in the economy of any country. Therefore, at present, the organization of advanced STEAM experiments and the effective use of STEAM educational software are taking an increasingly important place in the education system of developed countries. The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of using the STEAM project method, integrative scientific and technological, engineering, art and mathematical education (STEAM) on the development of interest among students in the physics specialty. The study was attended by 212 second-year students from the Kazakh-Turkish University named after Khoja Ahmed Yasawi and the South Kazakhstan University named after M. Auezov. Research work was carried out in both groups during the training of the course "Alternative energy sources". In the control group, this course was taught in the traditional way, and in the experimental group, classes based on STEAM projects were conducted. The educational process continued for 15 weeks. In this feature, pre- and post-participation calculations, especially surveys, and progress calculations are used to create a student score. The results of the study indicated that STEAM products developed by the authors together with students and used in the educational process are effective. Progressive results increase in the observation of the physics parse was high and the progressives were included. Student relationships in physics increased by 35% in the experimental group, compared to 10% previously. Through the implementation of STEAM projects, it was noticed that students' interest in physics increased to a significant extent. The article presents STEAM educational resources and materials developed by the authors and recommendations for their use in the educational process.
Downloads
References
Love, T. S., & Wells, J. G. (2017). Examining correlations between preparation experiences of US technology and engineering educators and their teaching of science content and practices. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 28, 395–416.
Gupta, J., & Vegelin, C. (2023). Inclusive development, leaving no one behind, justice and the sustainable development goals. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 23, 115–121.
Dosymov, Y., Usembayeva, I., Polatuly, S., Ramankulov, S., Kurbanbekov, B., Mintassova, A., & Mussakhan, N. (2023). Effectiveness of computer modeling in the study of electrical circuits: Application and evaluation. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 13, 93–112.
Rababah, A., Nikitina, N. I., Grebennikova, V. M., Gardanova, Z. R., Zekiy, A. O., Ponkratov, V. V., Bashkirova, N. N., Kuznetsov, N. V., Volkova, T. I., Vasiljeva, M. V., Ivleva, M. I., & Elyakova, I. D. (2021). University social responsibility during the COVID-19 pandemic: Universities’ case in the BRICS countries. Sustainability, 13, 7035.
Zhan, Z., Shen, W., Xu, Z., Niu, S., & You, G. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of the global landscape on STEM education (2004-2021): Towards global distribution, subject integration, and research trends. Asia Pacific Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 16, 171–203.
Republic of Kazakhstan, Government of the. (2023). On approval of the concept for the development of preschool, secondary, technical and vocational education in the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2023-2029 (Resolution No. 249). March 28, 2023.
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development needs for the implementation of integrated approaches to STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4.
Hadi, F. R. (2021). Efektifitas model PBL terintegrasi STEM terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis matematis siswa kelas V SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5, 6644–6649.
Yaqin, F., & Sarfo, J. O. (2023). Factors associated with creativity among STEM learners: A structural equation modeling approach. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 12, 1014–1030.
Montés, N., Hilario, L., Rivera, J., López, Á., Ferrer, T., Verdejo, P., Juan, I., & Ábalos, A. (2023). The equilibrium challenge, a new way to teach engineering mechanics in architecture degrees. Education Sciences, 13, 398.
Shektibayev, N. A., Sarybaeva, A. K., Turalbayeva, A., Anarbayev, A. K., Ramankulov, S. J., Turmambekov, T. A., Berkimbayev, M. O., & Batyrbekova, A. Z. (2017). A model of the future teachers’ professional competence formation in the process of physics teaching. Man in India, 97(11), 517–529.
Mukataeva, Z., Dinmukhamedova, A., Kabieva, S., Baidalinova, B., Khamzina, S., Zekenova, L., & Aizman, R. (2022). Comparative characteristics of developing morphofunctional features of schoolchildren from different climatic and geographical regions. Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology and Metabolism, 36(2), 158-166.
Saputro, V. C. E., Wasis, N., & Prastowo, T. (2023). The effectiveness of STEM-based guided inquiry learning to train science literacy of physics. Studies in Learning and Teaching, 3, 141–148.
Scalettar, B. A., & Abney, J. R. (2023). Integrating imaging physics into undergraduate STEM education. Biophysical Journal, 122, 554a.
Yedilbayev, Y., Sarybayeva, A., Zharylgapova, D., Shektibayev, N., Usembayeva, I., & Kurbanbekov, B. (2023). Factors influencing future physics teachers’ acceptance of information and communicative competence technologies: A survey study. Cogent Education, 10.
Haryadi, R., & Pujiastuti, H. (2022). Enhancing pre-service physics teachers’ higher-order thinking skills through STEM-PjBL model. International Journal of STEM Education and Sustainability, 2, 156–171.
Apriyani, R., Ramalis, T. R., & Suwarma, I. R. (2019). Analyzing student’s problem solving abilities of direct current electricity in STEM-based learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2, 85–91.
Otelbaev, M., Durmagambetov, A. A., & Seitkulov, Ye. N. (2008). Conditions for existence of a global strong solution to one class of nonlinear evolution equations in Hilbert Space. II. Siberian Mathematical Journal, 49, 684–691.
Otelbaev, M., Durmagambetov, A. A., & Seitkulov, E. N. (2006). Existence conditions for a global strong solution to one class of nonlinear evolution equations in a Hilbert Space. Doklady Mathematics, 73, 391–393.
Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing students’ creativity through STEM project-based learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2, 50.
Ramankulov, S. Z., Dosymov, E., Mintassova, A. S., & Pattayev, A. M. (2019). Assessment of student creativity in teaching physics in a foreign language. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 8, 587–599.
Shahbazloo, F., & Mirzaie, R. A. (2023). Investigating the effect of 5E-based STEM education in solar energy context on creativity and academic achievement of female junior high school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101336.
Vandaele, N., & Porter, W. (2015). Renewable energy in developing and developed nations: Outlooks to 2040. Journal of Undergraduate Research, 15, 1.
Marsh, J. (2022). How do solar cells work? Photovoltaic cells explained. Energysage.
Wolniak, R., & Skotnicka-Zasadzień, B. (2022). Development of photovoltaic energy in EU countries as an alternative to fossil fuels. Energies, 15, 662.
Voss, K., Rizaoglu, I. K., Balcerzak, A., & Hansen, H. (2023). Solar energy engineering and solar system integration – The Solar Decathlon Europe 21/22 student competition experiences. Energy and Buildings, 285, 112891.
Hosman, N. J., Supian, F. L., Wei, T. S., Mohamad, S. A. M. S., Azmi, M. S. M., & Mohtar, L. E. (2022). Development of technology-embedded solar energy STEM (SESTEM) module among Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) diploma science students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309, 012076.
Web of Science. (n.d.). Web of Science. Retrieved June 30, 2024, from https://clarivate.com/cis/solutions/web-of-science/
Scopus Preview. (n.d.). Scopus. Retrieved June 30, 2024, from www.scopus.com
Colmenares-Quintero, R. F., Caicedo-Concha, D. M., Rojas, N., Stansfield, K. E., & Colmenares-Quintero, J. C. (2023). Problem based learning and design thinking methodologies for teaching renewable energy in engineering programs: Implementation in a Colombian University context. Cogent Engineering, 10.
Toirov, Z., Juraev, H. O., Toshev, Y. N., & Kahharov, S. K. (2020). Using alternative energy sources devices as teaching tools. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 8(5), 13–17.
Hiğde, E. (2022). The effects of STEM-based alternative energy activities on STEM teaching intention and attitude. e-International Journal of Educational Research.
Mayasari, T., Susilowati, E., & Winarno, N. (2019). Practicing integrated STEM in renewable energy projects: Solar power. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280, 052033.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Qubahan Academic Journal
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.