A Comprehensive Framework for Improving the Assessment of Human Capital Quality: Evidence from Regional Analysis in Western Kazakhstan

Zhanargul Bissembiyeva; Aigul Maidyrova; Elena  Kastakova; Bibigul Issayeva; Jamilya Seitkhozhina; Adil Tolepov; Aizhan Khoich

doi:10.48161/qaj.v6n2a2378

Authors

Zhanargul Bissembiyeva Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Higher School of Economics and Tourism, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan; https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9807-3908
Aigul Maidyrova Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Higher School of Economics and Tourism, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7053-5225
Elena Kastakova Department of International Trade, Faculty of Commerce, Bratislava University of Economics and Business, 811 01 Bratislava, Slovakia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4215-4836
Bibigul Issayeva Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Higher School of Economics and Tourism, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-2896
Jamilya Seitkhozhina Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Higher School of Economics and Tourism, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4412-9813
Adil Tolepov Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Higher School of Economics and Tourism, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9961-5088
Aizhan Khoich Department of Economics and Entrepreneurship, Higher School of Economics and Tourism, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010000 Astana, Kazakhstan; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0128-3052

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v6n2a2378

Keywords:

Human capital, Quality assessment, Regional development, Investment, Socio-economic policy.

Abstract

This study addresses the growing need for more robust and systematic approaches to assessing the quality of human capital in the context of ongoing socio-economic transformation. Human capital is recognized as a key driver of sustainable economic growth, regional competitiveness, and improved development outcomes. Its quality is shaped by institutional environments, state social and educational policies, and investment levels in education, healthcare, and professional skill development. The main objective of this study is to enhance existing approaches to evaluating human capital quality through an integrated analytical framework. The methodology combines a systematic literature review, comparative analysis, and conceptual modeling to capture the multidimensional nature of human capital as an economic, institutional, and social construct. This interdisciplinary approach enables a more comprehensive understanding of how human capital quality can be measured and interpreted across regions. The originality of the study lies in its synthesis and classification of existing measurement approaches, with particular attention to the context of Kazakhstan’s socially oriented economic model and sustainable development priorities. The research proposes a structured framework for ranking human capital quality into high, medium, and low levels based on key assessment criteria. This classification provides a practical tool for policymakers to evaluate regional disparities and improve the design of socio-economic development strategies. The findings contribute to both theoretical advancement and practical policymaking by offering an improved basis for monitoring, comparing, and enhancing human capital quality at the regional level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ivanovic, D., Jha, S., & Fejes, J. K. (2023). Government expenditure on education and human development in developing countries: Evidence from a pre-2022 unbalanced panel dataset. Qubahan EcoLead Journal, 2(2).

Official Information Resource of the Prime Minister of the Republic of Kazakhstan. (2025). Human capital as a priority: Budget expenditures on the social sphere in 2025 amount to 9.6 trillion tenge.

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2025). Global Innovation Index 2025: Kazakhstan.

Parushina, N., Lytneva, N. A., & Semidelikhin, E. A. (2017). Methods of measuring and evaluating human capital (scientific review). Scientific Review. Economic Sciences, 2, 89–99.

Degtyareva, N., & Buruk, A. F. (2022). Methodological approaches and problems of human capital measurement. Bulletin of Altai Academy of Economics and Law, 3(1), 32–36.

Bogatova, A. (2013). Methodological approaches to human capital assessment. Bulletin of Altai State Agrarian University, 3(101), 135–139.

Reshetnikov, S. B., & Skirdov, M. R. (2017). Analysis of methodological approaches to defining and evaluating human capital. Russian Journal of Industrial Economics, 10(1), 59–66.

Koshanov, A., & Chulanova, Z. K. (2021). Some approaches to evaluating the state of human capital: The case of Kazakhstan. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 6. Economics, 4, 49–72.

Kristinevich, S. (2013). Quantitative approaches to evaluating the effectiveness of human capital development. In Innovative economic development: Entrepreneurship, education, science (pp. 284–288). Minsk.

Biryukov, V. (2012). Human capital of the Republic of Kazakhstan as a productive resource: Methodological aspect (Doctoral dissertation abstract). Bishkek.

World Bank. (2024). Human Capital Project Fact Sheet. World Bank Group.

World Bank. (2024). The Human Capital Project: Protect and Invest in People. World Bank Group.

Égert, B., de la Maisonneuve, C., & Turner, D. (2022). A new macroeconomic measure of human capital exploiting PISA and PIAAC: Linking education policies to productivity (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1709).

Duran, J., Jordan, M. A., & Siedschlag, I. (2025). An industry-level measure of quality-adjusted human capital in the European Union (ESRI Working Paper No. 812).

United Nations Development Programme. (2023/2024). Human Development Report 2023/2024: Breaking the gridlock.

Rakhimzhanova, G., Shayakhmetova, L., Tolepov, A., Maidyrova, A., & Tadjieva, S. (2024). Economic assessment of the quality of human capital. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 20(4), 225–238.

World Bank., UNICEF., & UNESCO. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update.

European Training Foundation. (2022). Skills mismatch measurement: Final report.

UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2024). Measuring and monitoring learning outcomes and skills: Background paper.

World Bank. (n.d.). Learning-adjusted years of schooling (LAYS): Human capital indicator methodology.

Sagdeeva, L. (2012). Quality of human capital as a factor of socio-economic regional development (Candidate dissertation abstract). Saint Petersburg.

Ibragimova, D. (2017). Human capital: Concept, role, and issues of accumulation in the modern economy. Krasnodar: Kuban State University.

Egorov, V. (2024). Measuring the quality of human potential in the modern economy: Management perspective. Power and Governance in Eastern Russia, 1(106), 84–96.

World Bank. (2018). Human capital gap [Electronic resource].

Neshataev, A. (2023). Human capital in territories with different welfare levels: Measurement and impact. Regionology, 31(1), 123–142.

Samorodova, E. M., Fedonina, O. V., & Musaev, B. M. (2023). Accumulated and potential human capital in its reproduction system: Cross-country comparisons using correlation-regression analysis. Natural-Humanitarian Research, 45(1), 199–213.

World Bank Group. (2019). Human capital development project.

Égert, B., de la Maisonneuve, C., & Turner, D. (2024). A new macroeconomic measure of human capital exploiting PISA and PIAAC: Linking education policies to productivity. Education Economics, 32(6), 745–761.

Sari, V. A., & Tiwari, S. (2024). The geography of human capital: Insights from the subnational human capital index in Indonesia. Social Indicators Research, 172, 673–702.